Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 221 - 240
of 19,773
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2014, 4:13 pm
Co. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 10:55 am
By having in place different trade marks for the same product in different Member States the court held that there was an unjustified “artificial partitioning of the market” by the trade mark owner constituting a disguised restriction on trade. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 2:14 am
Having duked the matter out in the United States Patents and Trademarks Office, and subsequently at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, the matter has moved on to the District Court of Virginia, where the decision was handed down only a few days ago.Pro-Football Inc v Amanda Blackhorse et al. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 5:13 am
In Arista v. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 2:46 am
These questions were recently answered in a ruling by the CJEU in the Globus v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 4:59 am
In doing so, the Supreme Court rejected the result of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Person's Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 3:20 pm
There again, the peculiarly interesting state of trade mark law in the United Kingdom and, not far beyond it, in the territory of the European Economic Area, might be closer to the cause. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 7:27 am
It will be difficult for a Cuban trade mark applicant who lives in the United States and who travels around to avoid being found to be a bad faith trade mark applicant, being a person with previous knowledge of all those trade marks. [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:43 am
The Maine Supreme Judicial Court recently decided State of Maine v. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 2:16 am
Lutz Superdyne, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 1:39 am
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com]IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 07-1603 MARK DEAN SCHWAB, Appellant, Death Warrant Signed v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 8:33 am
Patent Compliance Group, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:20 pm
This morning, the Court handed down its opinion in United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 3:14 pm
In truth, though, for slogan marks the public’s perception is not the same as for other types of marks and, therefore, assessing their distinctiveness results more difficult.In the light of Audi v OHIM the General Court addressed some typical issues affecting slogan marks. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 12:28 am
Brunetti and the opinion of the AG Bobek in Constantin Film Produktion v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 2:48 pm
See Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 2:04 pm
At least one false marking plaintiff is following the lead of the most prolific false marking plaintiff, Thomas Simonian, by borrowing, word for word, the additional paragraph Mr. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:00 am
On August 31, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its decision in Stauffer v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 8:49 am
John Bean Technologies Corp. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 1:33 pm
John's Law Review Symposium: 40th Anniversary of Plyler v. [read post]
