Search for: "State v. Newton" Results 221 - 240 of 410
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
McDonald v Newton or McDonald (Scotland), heard 11 May 2017. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 9:04 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The Newtons contend that this lawsuit is a manifestation of guilt on the part of Ms. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 11:08 am by Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff
Responding to the invitation from the Supreme Court, the Solicitor General for the United States has filed an amicus brief for the United States in Hikma Pharmaceuticals USC Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm by John Elwood
United States, 17-778, United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 2:00 am by NCC Staff
The issue made it to the Supreme Court, where Chief Justice Edward White wrote in Wilson v. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 1:31 pm by Editor
Newton, The Iraqi High Criminal Court: controversy and contributions Cambridge Law Journal (United Kingdom), Volume 65, Issue 3, November 2006 Roger O'Keefe, CRIMES, THE COURTS AND CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW Penelope Nevill, QUALIFYING THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT: DETENTION UNDER SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS Jillaine Seymour, IMMUNITY FOR TORTURE: THE STATE AND ITS REPRESENTATIVES REUNITED Oregon Review of International Law, Volume 8, Number 2, Summer 2006 Ben Chigara,… [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
The Sun editor Victoria Newton said the paper “welcome(d) the closure of this investigation,” calling it “an outrageous abuse of state power which risked having a chilling impact on whistleblowers and a free press,” the Press Gazette reports. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 6:05 am by Leila Nadya Sadat
In the most comprehensive iteration of the theory (which I dub version 3.0), Michael Newton argues that the ICC’s prescriptive and adjudicative jurisdiction is limited to whatever the State can transfer to it, meaning that a Status of Forces Agreement (“SOFA”) granting the United States jurisdiction over crimes committed by its troops in Afghanistan means that Afghanistan cannot “delegate” jurisdiction over U.S. nationals to the Court. [read post]