Search for: "State v. Personnel Housing" Results 221 - 240 of 1,077
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2020, 11:59 am by Anna Salvatore
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 7:03 am by John Jascob
SEC (U.S. 1983); that they circulated the information openly in emails that included in-house counsel and compliance personnel; and that they did not personally profit from the trading. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 12:32 pm by Jane Turner
In July of 2011, he filed a qui tam lawsuit under the False Claims Act, Blake Percival v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 12:32 pm by Jane Turner
In July of 2011, he filed a qui tam lawsuit under the False Claims Act, Blake Percival v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 11:32 am by Anne Joseph O'Connell
But these succession issues have gained a more public profile after the Government Accountability Office (GAO), a watchdog that works for Congress, issued a legal opinion in August dinging key personnel moves as illegal. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am by Paul Rosenzweig, Vishnu Kannan
More pointedly, it provides (in §606(c)) that: Upon proclamation by the President that there exists war or a threat of war, or a state of public peril or disaster or other national emergency, or in order to preserve the neutrality of the United States, the President, if he deems it necessary in the interest of national security or defense, may suspend or amend, for such time as he may see fit, the rules and regulations applicable to any or all stations or devices capable of… [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 1:08 pm by John Ross
Fifth Circuit: It is, notwithstanding Justice Alito's suggestion in Reed v. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 7:40 pm by Keith E. Whittington
The Secretary of State announced that the United States would impose sanctions on a prosecutor of the International Criminal Court who is investigating American personnel for war crimes. [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 5:15 am by Matt Gluck, Tia Sewell
Nathaniel Sobel and Julia Solomon-Strauss discussed the most recent developments in the Trump v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 10:43 am by Leslie Griffin
With three more votes, your state could choose whatever religion it wants. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 2:40 pm by Matt Gluck
Nathaniel Sobel discussed the recent developments in the Trump v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 3:07 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Strengthening compliance personnel’s ability to expose fraud Compliance personnel are the first line of defense against fraud. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
Remember that day’s Espinoza v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 11:06 am by Amy Howe
Sotomayor also warned about the broader implications of today’s ruling, suggesting that the decision could extend to “countless coaches, camp counselors, nurses, social-service workers, in-house lawyers, media-relations personnel, and many others who work for religious institutions. [read post]