Search for: "State v. R. Hope"
Results 221 - 240
of 5,397
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2012, 1:01 pm
Since the 2003 SCOTUS decision, Grutter v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 5:07 pm
R. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 5:02 am
Lord Hope also indicated that he would have considered the potential for an appeal to the Upper Tribunal curative of any breach of Article 6, following Albert and Le Compte v Belgium (1983) 5 EHRR 533, para 29; Tehrani v United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting [2001] IRLR 208; R (Thompson) v Law Society [2004] 1 WLR 2522 There is one curiosity in the reasoning of Lord Dyson in that he seeks to dismiss concerns that the… [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 10:30 am
Todd Dickinson of Polsinelli, Judge Theodore Essex of Hogan Lovells, Retired Chief Judge Paul Michel, and Robert Stoll of Drinker Biddle discussed the Supreme Court case eBay Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 10:28 am
Mayer Brown’s Partner James R. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 11:42 pm
State Immunity, Violation of Human Rights and the Individual’s Right for Reparations – A Comment on the ICJ’s Judgment of February 2, 2012 (Germany v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 7:33 am
That choice led to a dispute in Mace v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 7:26 am
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, March 21, 2017, Posner, R.). [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 5:28 am
In R(Hamid) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 3070 (Admin) [not on Baili yet, but apparently on Lawtel], the Divisional Court signalled its intention to get much tougher on out of hours administrative court applications to the duty Judge. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 10:00 am
The House unanimously dismissed his appeal (see R (Wellington) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 72; [2009] 1 AC 335.) [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 6:14 am
Let's hope this is just another rumor. [read post]
29 Oct 2023, 11:26 am
Mar. 24, 2004); Kathleen R. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:12 pm
Karen R. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:35 pm
Posner, who had written the 2007 appeals court opinion upholding the Indiana law, later affirmed by the Supreme Court.Civil rights groups had hoped the Supreme Court would use the Wisconsin case, Frank v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 4:48 pm
The order (NetChoice LLC v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 6:43 pm
See United States v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:11 am
” United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am
She confirms that the court hopes to give its decision early next week and adjourns proceedings. 1515: Lord Pannick QC ends his submissions. 1512: Lord Pannick QC sums up that if the court makes a declaration that the prorogation of Parliament was unlawful then it would be for Parliament to reconvene and for them to decide what to do next. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 7:18 pm
Jason Schultz, R-Schleswig, thanked [Senator Julian] Garrett for advancing the bill, saying it's a measure needed in this day and age. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:50 am
Second, and giving all appropriate weight to what was said in R (C (A Minor)) v Secretary of State for Justice [2008] EWCA Civ 882, [2009] QB 657, and E v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary and another (Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission and others intervening) [2008] UKHL 66, [2009] 1 AC 536, the circumstan [read post]
