Search for: "State v. R. V. B."
Results 221 - 240
of 15,485
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2008, 4:27 am
R. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 3:00 am
Sumption concluded that the test is as set out in R v Hughes: there must be “at least some act or omission in the control of the car which involves some element of fault, whether amounting to careless/inconsiderate driving or not, and which contributes in some more than minimal way to the death”. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 12:14 am
In particular, the court considered the deemed lawful taking of photographs by police officers as in R (Wood) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2010] 1 WLR 123 and R (Catt) v Association of Chief Police Officers [2015] AC 1065. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 9:07 am
R. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 7:03 am
In Tyson Foods, a group of workers brought a proposed Rule 23(b)(3) class action against their employer for unpaid overtime in violation of Iowa state wage-and-hour law as well as a putative collective action under the FLSA. [read post]
15 May 2013, 8:00 am
In 2011, the United States Supreme Court vacated that decision and ordered the Ninth Circuit to reconsider it in light of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm
Commentary comes from Suzanne B. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 12:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 5:15 am
The determinations of the Board were all supported by substantial evidence (B/E Aerospace, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 2:24 am
AH (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 395; [2012] WLR (D) 106 “In looking to the question whether an asylum seeker, who had been a member of a terrorist organisation and convicted of a crime outside the country of refuge, fell to be excluded from the Refugee Convention pursuant to article 1F(b) and (c) thereof, one had to avoid applying a presumption of individual liability; and in asking whether the crime in question was… [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 3:54 am
R. [read post]
5 May 2021, 3:29 pm
R. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 5:15 am
R. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 8:43 am
The district court observed that the United States Supreme Court has established that "[b]efore a federal court may exercise personal jurisdiction over a defendant, the procedural requirement of service of summons must be satisfied. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 6:28 am
Kathleen B. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 8:53 am
’ ConocoPhillips Co. v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 8:00 am
In Kuxhausen v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 9:46 am
The Supreme Court reversed the Federal Circuit and ruled that 28 U.S.C. 1400(b) remains the only applicable patent venue statute, that 28 U.S.C. 1391(c) did not modify or amend 1400(b) or the Court's 1957 ruling in Fourco Glass Co. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 11:12 am
The case of R. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 7:28 am
John B. [read post]
