Search for: "State v. San"
Results 221 - 240
of 8,619
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2015, 8:00 am
Westminster and an exhibit on the litigation in the federal courthouse in San Diego. [read post]
26 May 2017, 3:29 pm
Even if Plaintiffs’ public nudity at political rallies was entitled to First Amendment protection, however, we hold that the challenged ordinance is a valid, content-neutral regulation as applied to Plaintiffs’ expressive conduct under United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 2:36 pm
Related Cases: Williams v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 9:10 am
Francis Hotel in San Francisco. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 11:27 am
Here is the opinion in United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
(People v. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 11:54 am
In a San Diego, California, case, AF Holdings v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 7:30 am
Roberta V. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 1:17 pm
Superior Court of California, San Francisco County BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 9:20 am
On June 16, 2014, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 9:20 am
On June 16, 2014, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 1:44 pm
In this case we consider how these rules apply to an order requiring a local legislative body, the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors, to remove and replace one of its members. [read post]
23 May 2013, 3:25 pm
However, in April 2013, the United States Supreme Court ruled on this issue in Missouri v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 7:41 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 11:16 pm
§ 174.006(a); City of San Antonio v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 3:01 am
San Remo Hotel, L.P. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
United States Citizenship & Immigration Services. 407 F.Supp.3d 311 (D.D.C. 2019); Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 12:40 pm
Time will tell.Meanwhile, today's opinion is a pretty clear win for the counties -- and a loss for the state -- which will get more money to help pay for SVP proceedings. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:32 pm
In People v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 6:35 am
De LaRosa's semantic alchemy defies the criteria for gang activity as defined inthe CDCR rules and regulations, as well as the standard set forth in the1994 case Castillo v. [read post]
