Search for: "State v. Short"
Results 221 - 240
of 22,648
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2024, 4:52 pm
Footnotes[+] Footnotes ↑1 Strain v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
The HSP authors settled on a definition of “first use” as any use of a PPA product within 24 hours, and no other uses in the previous two weeks.[13] Given the rapid onset of pressor and depressor effects, and adaptation response, this definition of first use was generous and likely included many irrelevant exposed cases, but at least the definition attempted to incorporate the phenomena of short-lived effect and adaption. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 9:56 am
Leroy v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 3:03 pm
In People v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 8:42 am
New Article: Colleen V. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 11:11 am
From last week's Mississippi Supreme Court decision in State v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Rev. 965 (2017); Atherton v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
In Sails v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:56 pm
Proc. 97-35, and cases like RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm
Other states Mis-classification of gig workers has been a major issue in numerous states. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:24 am
State v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
The short answer is no, but the longer answer is maybe.As originally enacted, the federal RFRA required religious exceptions to laws at all levels of government—federal, state, and local. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:47 am
Under the doctrine, named after the Supreme Court’s 1950 decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:22 am
Folks who’ve been following this blog for years know that periodically I like to venture beyond New York’s borders to find and report on interesting decisions from other states in business divorce cases. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
In last year's landmark affirmative action case, SFFA v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
One might say that it is easier for business managers and investors to focus only on the primary objective of short-term and long-term profits. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:19 am
The short summary I prepared fleshes out the themes I hope to cover: Regulatory governance is well within a process of transformation from a managerial system deeply embedded in the classical model of the rule-of-law state grounded in positive (or customary) law pronounced by an authoritative body clothed in the legislative power, to the world of the panopticon and the disciplines. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 3:04 am
” Nicholson v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Hall notes that under the test Justice Gorsuch articulates in his Gundy v. [read post]
