Search for: "State v. Sinclair"
Results 221 - 240
of 241
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2024, 3:44 am
Second-time President of the United States of America. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 7:18 am
Silk, Sabastian V. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 4:02 pm
Co. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 3:35 pm
Almost two decades ago, I learned several lessons as a Congressional lawyer, some more useful than others. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 7:48 pm
Co. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 10:25 am
Sinclair (D.D.C.). [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 12:18 pm
If any benefits are provided by an outside third-party then the employer may want to make sure to state in the contract that the employee’s rights under these benefit plans shall be determined entirely by the terms and conditions of the plans and the employee shall have no independent rights as against the employer in connection with the said benefits. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 12:18 pm
If any benefits are provided by an outside third-party then the employer may want to make sure to state in the contract that the employee’s rights under these benefit plans shall be determined entirely by the terms and conditions of the plans and the employee shall have no independent rights as against the employer in connection with the said benefits. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
Sprigman: Came up in Apple v. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 2:44 pm
” Delivering the majority decision in Voisine v United States, Justice Elena Kagan eloquently stated: “Reckless conduct, which requires the conscious disregard of a known risk, is not an accident: It involves a deliberate decision to endanger another. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 10:00 pm
The three judge DeCoster appeals panel issued a three-opinion ruling, with the majority advancing a concept of responsible corporate officer liability arising from the FDCA and the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:00 pm
This devolution jurisdiction was first exercised by the Privy Council to rule on allegations of Convention rights violations by the prosecution in both solemn procedure (Montgomery v HMA 2001 SC (PC) 1, 19 October 2000) and summary criminal procedure (Brown v Stott 2001 SC (PC) 43, 5 December 2000). [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 12:22 am
Click here to see a copy of Blake v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
Finally, on this most American of holidays, we cannot ignore the Eleventh Circuit's decision in Farias v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:25 pm
However, I often find that time is an elusive concept and for me the “nearness” of Noble v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Federal and state rules already require reporting of most Scope 1 emissions, including the pollution from power plants that are others’ Scope 2 emissions. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
“Head-of-state-owned enterprise” immunity. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm
It was also submitted for judicial review to the Federal Court in Chrétien v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
Then in 1973 the Supreme Court of Canada case Calder v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
” (R. v. [read post]
