Search for: "Steven Jones"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,107
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2018, 4:01 am
” In an interview with Adam Liptak for The New York Times, 98-year-old retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens talks about his upcoming memoir and “single[s] out three decisions as grave errors, noting that he had dissented in all of them. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 9:30 pm
Livingston (Rutgers Law School) has posted The Other F-Word: Fascism, The “Rule of Law,” and the Trump Era, a review essay on several books “that have suggested parallels between 1930s-style fascism and present day politics, especially that of the Trump Administration,” including some of our summer reading (Timothy Snyder’s Road to Unfreedom and Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt’s How Democracies Die). [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 7:18 am
The November 2018 issue of the American Bar Association Journal (ABAJ) featured an exposé-style article on the hazards of our chemical environment, worthy of Mother Jones, or the International Journal of Health Nostrums, by a lawyer, Alan Bell.1Alan Bell, according to his website, is a self-described “environmental health warrior. [read post]
3 Nov 2018, 9:17 am
Case Background During the 1970’s, when Steven Schmitz played college football for Appellant Notre Dame, he received repetitive concussive and subconcussive brain impacts. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 2:20 pm
Scrivani, Stevens & Lee, Elizabeth Ware, Stevens & Lee, pro hac vice & Nicholas H. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm
Prior to the start of the Michaelmas legal term on 1 October 2018 we have collated some of the most significant developments over the previous two months. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 4:55 am
Why didn’t they reach out to him, the guy who won Ex parte Jones. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 10:00 am
In April, in Ex Parte Jones, a Texas appellate court ruled that Texas’ NCP law was unconstitutional. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 3:23 pm
YeganAssociate Justice Steven Z. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm
If the trial judge in the Jones case had applied that standard correctly, she would not have allowed Jones’s lawyers to question Clinton about the precise details of his affair with Lewinsky.Nevertheless, allow it she did, and the fact that the questions should have been ruled inadmissible was no justification for Clinton’s lying—by denying the affair with Lewinsky—in the Jones case. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 2:59 pm
Hatcher PovertyLawProf Baltimore Will Hubbard ProfHubbard Baltimore Robert Knowles ProfKnowles Baltimore Civil Procedure National Security Law Colin Starger ColinStarger Baltimore Tsilly Dagan TsillyDagan Bar-Ilan Nadia Ahmad gatormob Barry Jeffrey Usman Prawfish Belmont Máiréad Enright marieadenright Birmingham (UK) Law & Religion Feminism… [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 8:33 am
Steven D. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 4:30 am
” According to the Associated Press, Alabama Democratic senator “Doug Jones says he is keeping an ‘open mind’ on … Kavanaugh. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 12:12 pm
The Trump administration released its latest escalation in the budding trade war with China on July 10: a 195-page list of $200 billion worth of Chinese goods that may soon be subject to a 10 percent tariff. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 8:08 am
Jeffrey Jones presents the results of a Gallup poll: A “four-percentage point margin [in favor of Kavanaugh’s confirmation] is slimmer than any Gallup has measured in its initial read on 10 prior nominees since 1987,” with the average margin being 23 points. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 6:42 am
My email inbox has gotten out of control, and I had to declare partial email bankruptcy. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:21 pm
Although Kennedy frequently assigned the opinions in such instances, the associate justice who most often performed that function was Justice John Paul Stevens. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 3:03 pm
This does not bode well for, say, an embrace of Steven Calabresi’s recent argument against the constitutionality of the Mueller probe should the president’s lawyers bring such a claim before a Justice Kavanaugh. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 7:57 am
Lord Hodge (on behalf of Lady Hale, Lord Hughes and Lord Lloyd-Jones) delivered the majority view, with only Lord Briggs dissenting. [read post]
