Search for: "Stokes v. Stokes" Results 221 - 240 of 572
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2018, 11:01 am by Andy Pushalik
Papp v Stokes et al, 2017 ONSC 2357 – Employer’s negative reference does not trigger damages because it was substantially true and is covered by qualified privilege (so long as there is no proof of malice). [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Stokes v Ragless  [2017] SASC 159 Bampton J awarded general and aggravated damages of Aus$90.000 in respect of website, email and Facebook publications. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 7:41 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Two recent cases out of Ontario’s Superior Court, Papp v Stokes Economic Consulting Inc., (Papp) and Kanak v Riggin, (Kanak), provide guidance to employers on avoiding liability when giving employment references. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 3:17 am by Scott Bomboy
The question indirectly came before the Supreme Court in 1870 in a case called Virginia v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 8:02 am by Daily Record Staff
Ennis’s group eventually left the party and later met an acquaintance of theirs, Jarrett Stokes, in the ... [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 2:28 pm by Giles Peaker
E, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Islington [2017] EWHC 1440 (Admin) E is a nine year old child, who brought the claim through her mother, C. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 4:24 am by SHG
Not that the forces of tolerance will bother to learn anything more about the case of Masterpeice Cake Shop v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 12:59 pm by Alex Potcovaru, Quinta Jurecic
The Supreme Court granted a writ of certiorari in Carpenter v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 9:36 am
Yesterday's DJ had a couple appellate articles of note:The Appellate Zealots column by Charles Kagay covered the Cal Supremes' anti-SLAPP opinion in Barry v. [read post]