Search for: "Story v. Price-Story" Results 221 - 240 of 2,121
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2022, 8:43 am by Eric Goldman
Troia wasn’t offering any services at all, but also, note the ad copy–the headline says “horror story” and the text says “They abruptly fired me,” which were pretty good tipoffs to consumers of what they should expect at the link. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:45 am by Nabiha Syed
Wyeth (09-152), Harrington v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 9:49 am
  Today a Ninth Circuit panel issues an important ruling concerning the safety valve in US v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
There were many reports of these statements, including Press Gazette, the Guardian and Tabloid Watch. 2.12.11 TLJ/10/0482 (sic) Andre v Price. [read post]
26 May 2013, 8:31 pm by Aparajita Lath
SpicyIP saw a very busy week with many interesting developments -Image from hereThe week started with Sai’s insightful post on Microsoft v Motorola. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
I also pointed out that all sorts of questions remained to be answered.Last week, in Shankar v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 7:43 am by Tian Lu
 Chanel sued both the producer of the N°9 perfume, Yiwu Story of Love Cosmetics Co., Ltd. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 12:39 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  I have set out below the Top Ten D&O Stories of 2021, with a focus on the future implications. [read post]
6 May 2023, 2:57 pm by Ilya Somin
A later story, published on February 3, provides some additional information, including that the low price of Parcel 4A was because of the "cost of remediating the remaining contamination of soil and groundwater. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 6:30 am by John Jascob
The plaintiffs claim that the company issued misleading statements about Kodak’s prospects that inflated the stock’s value, and that they suffered losses when the share price subsequently fell after the misrepresentations became known to the market (Tang v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 5:38 pm
The asking price was $12,000 thought it's unclear from the AP story if that was the final price Dobyns paid for them. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 3:47 pm by Howard Ullman
Moral of the story: claims under the Robinson-Patman Act require two or more actual sales, and a discrimination in price. [read post]