Search for: "Strickland v. Day" Results 221 - 240 of 338
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2011, 3:02 am by SHG
The idiosyncracy is that New York hasn't adopted the federal test of Strickland v. [read post]
1 May 2011, 7:09 pm by cdw
The Supreme Court of Virginia’s opposite conclusion constituted an unreasonable application of federal law, as clearly established by the Supreme Court of the United States in Strickland v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 11:30 am by Mirriam Seddiq
  Here it goes:In February, the Maryland Court of Special Appeals issued a decision, Miller v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 12:22 pm by Bruce Carton
In his footnote 4, Simpson compared Sypher's motion with the Wikipedia entry for Strickland v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
Exxon Corp., 746 S.W.2d 694, 699 (Tenn. 1988) (citing Strickland v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 5:05 am by Susan Brenner
Whaley arrived at the station later that day. . . . [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 3:00 am by Deepak Gupta
The co-chairs are Alan Kaplinsky, John Roddy, and Julia Strickland. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 10:40 pm by Stephen Page
That approach was adopted by Strickland J in Parker v Parker [2010] FamCA 664 (3 August 2010). [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 5:57 am
At 106.5 million viewers, last year's Saints-v-Colts match-up became the most watched program in history. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:09 pm by Aaron
Brown’s convictions, finding that the trial court correctly found that multiple no contact order violations based on contact on separate days did not violate double jeopardy, and that the trial court properly declined to give a Petrich instruction because Mr. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:28 pm by Michael O'Hear
  In my previous post, I discussed the habeas issues in one case, Harrington v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 12:58 pm by Michael O'Hear
 Today, in this post, I’ll focus on what the Court had to say about habeas law in one of the decisions, Harrington v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 10:35 am by John Elwood
  Then, applying established standards of review for AEDPA and ineffective-assistance claims under Strickland v. [read post]