Search for: "Sullivan v. State Bar" Results 221 - 240 of 559
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2016, 9:33 am by INFORRM
Back in 1964, in the landmark civil rights case of New York Times v Sullivan, the Court affirmed the signal importance of free debate about the public activities of politicians and other officials. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Accordingly, said the court, this case was governed by the rule of New York Times Co. v Sullivan, 376 US 254, in which the Supreme Court of the United States interpreted the First Amendment to the United States Constitution as embodying "the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:53 pm by Patricia Salkin
Editor’s Note: Thanks to Portland, OR attorney Edward Sullivan for this post. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:47 am by Dennis Crouch
AIPLA Peter Sullivan of Foley Hoag filed the AIPLA brief. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 7:21 pm by The Federalist Society
 Under this exception, sovereign immunity does not bar a lawsuit “based on a commercial activity carried on in the United States by [a] foreign state. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 9:48 am by Jeremy
It dives into the history of the 1909 Copyright Act and the resulting Herbert v Shanley Co. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:42 am
United States, 403 U.S. 713(1971) (Stewart, J., concurring); United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  From the First Amendment side, we have Reed v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 8:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Sullivan; no defense bar as such when the case came down, when such cases were dealt w/by private detectives and not 1A lawyers—thought [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm by John Elwood
United States, 14-150; potential blockbuster Friedrichs v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 1:26 pm by Elina Saxena, Quinta Jurecic
A French initiative to bar the five veto-wielding powers on the Security Council in cases of mass atrocities has met with approval from dozens of states but not from the other four permanent members, the Post reports. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 12:32 pm by S. Donnelly
Seminar topics include: Trends in tribal courts Negotiating contracts with tribes and tribal entities Dollar General Corporation v. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 6:03 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Thus, the court said, “the plain language of the insured v. insured exclusion appears to unambiguously bar coverage by the FDIC-R against director-defendants. [read post]