Search for: "THOMAS SHARPE"
Results 221 - 240
of 915
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2020, 11:53 am
“Twitter has faced frequent, sharp public criticisms for taking no action when users post false, misleading and harmful statements. [read post]
18 May 2020, 1:52 pm
Indeed, the Fokker Services court drew a sharp distinction between cases in a pretrial posture—like all deferred prosecution agreements—and cases like Flynn’s in which a defendant has pleaded guilty and the court is called upon to impose a sentence. [read post]
13 May 2020, 6:20 am
Thomas pushes for clarification. [read post]
12 May 2020, 1:24 pm
The justices heard argument last year on the question in Sharp v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 5:01 am
[We've filed a friend-of-the-court brief asking the Tennessee Supreme Court to review the case.] [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 9:11 am
Yet despite the mind-numbing technicality of that holding, Justice Neil Gorsuch, joined only in part by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, wrote a 23-page, rhetorically sharp dissent declaring that the decision marks a “rough day” that “carries us another step down the road of ceding core judicial powers to agency officials and leaving the disposition of private rights and liberties to bureaucratic mercy. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:38 am
“Behind the constitutional arguments [in both Congresses] loomed the political fact that the Secretary of State was Thomas Jefferson,” David Currie has noted. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 3:00 am
” Union Lobbying Question Confounds at 1st Circuit Courthouse News Service – Thomas Harrison | Published: 3/4/2020 The U.S. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 8:56 am
Grant is a keen observer and sharp commentator. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 2:00 am
On the second issue, Justice Cates, joined by Justice Thomas M. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 9:54 am
Day 2 and 3 of the hearing brought premature reports that the the Board of Appeal would be referring questions on priority to the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA), with Day 4 ultimately bringing the conclusion that Broad Institute's appeal would be dismissed, due to their patent being found to lack priority.SpecialKat Chijioke Okorie examined the decision of the Constitutional Court of South Africa in Ascendis Animal Health (Pty) Limited v Merck Sharp Dohme Corporation and 2 Others… [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am
In the McGahn oral argument, Judge Thomas Griffith, an appointee of George W. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 7:00 am
But Sohoni contends that in fact the converse is true: The federal courts’ 107-year history of granting injunctions affecting nonparties suggests that “it would be a sharp departure from precedent and practice” to bar them from doing so in the future. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 6:06 am
Kagan is a sharp writer and a good public presence in interviews. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 4:30 am
, Josef Leidenfrost, Natalie Sharpe (Experienced)Beyond Conflict: Ombuds as Advocates for Systemic Change, Sara Thacker, Julia Horvath (Experienced)Networking LunchConcurrent Session Block FourWhat Would a New Ombuds Do? [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:49 am
The justices also issued a sharp rebuke to the Texas courts that had reinstated the death penalty for an inmate, Bobby James Moore, even after the local district attorney’s office had agreed that the Eighth Amendment bans Moore’s execution because he is intellectually disabled. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 1:16 am
" What's imperative is a sharp decision that puts the disputed matter to rest for good. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 1:56 pm
Murphy (now called Sharp v. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 7:54 am
The judgment tells us a bit, but I'm not sure its a complete answer : 'Recognising the potential sensitivity, the Designated Family Judge for Birmingham, Her Honour Judge Thomas, directed at an early stage that the appeal should be conducted by another DFJ on the Midland Circuit but at a Court distant from Birmingham and by a Judge without any significant day to day working relationship with the District Judge. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 12:38 pm
While Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch concluded that SORNA violated the nondelegation doctrine, Justice Samuel Alito wrote that the law satisfied current doctrine, but said, “If a majority of this Court were willing to reconsider the approach we have taken for the past 84 years, I would support that effort. [read post]
