Search for: "Tam v. State" Results 221 - 240 of 1,446
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2017, 8:40 am by Tiffany Blofield
  The case involving the REDSKINS mark is currently on hold until the United States Supreme Court decides the In re Tam case. [read post]
2 May 2010, 4:39 am by Ben Vernia
He noted that a plain reading of the requirement was contrary to the company’s interpretation, and he rejected its argument that the First Circuit case of United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 7:02 am by Ana Popovich
” It also allegedly failed to satisfactorily notify patients and beneficiaries when it “converted multiple physician offices to Hospital Facilities, and then sought payment at higher rates,” the DOJ press release states. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
In fact, the State of Maryland allowed someone to sue on its behalf pursuant to state law in the landmark case of McCullough v. [read post]