Search for: "Taylor's Administrator v. Taylor"
Results 221 - 240
of 900
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2019, 7:38 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in Elhady v. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
This week’s summaries concern: Administrative Law – Civil Rights –Criminal Law – Insurance – Evidence ATCO Gas and Pipelines Ltd. et al. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 6:11 am
Spencer’s departure from the Trump administration. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 4:40 am
Citing People v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 1:17 pm
Quinta Jurecic posted the government and President Trump’s motion to dismiss in House Ways and Means Committee v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
A school employee who elected to submit an issue for resolution through a contractual grievance procedure may not appeal the same issue pursuant to Education Law §310Decisions of the Commissioner of Education, Decision No. 17,235In this appeal to the Commissioner of Education, the petitioner [Petitioner] contended that certain actions taken by school district administrators [District] and the president of employee organization [Association] of a recognized or certified employee… [read post]
10 May 2019, 12:03 pm
Circuit for a rehearing en banc in McKeever v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
For example, the rights of an individual in layoff situations in the classified service set out in §§80 and 80-a of the Civil Service Law are based on seniority which rights may not be adversely affected by the terms of a collective bargaining agreement [see City of Plattsburgh v Local 788, 108 AD2d 1045].The Commissioner’s decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.counsel.nysed.gov/Decisions/volume53/documents/d16584.pdf =========================The Layoff,… [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 7:36 am
Matthew Kahn shared the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit’s ruling in Davidson v. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 3:13 am
Not since Barnette v. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 8:59 am
Taylor. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:53 am
Although not identified as an issue in the Richfield Springs case, as the Appellate Division, Second Department noted in Port Washington USFD v Port Washington Teachers Association, 268 AD2d 523, [motion for leave to appeal denied, 95 NY2d 761], a statute, decisional law or public policy may preclude referring a Taylor Law contract dispute to arbitration.In Port Washington, the parties agreed to include a specific religious holiday provision in a Taylor Law agreement. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 9:01 am
Glenn (on conflicts of interest for ERISA administrators) No. 06-1505, Meacham v. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
"Pursuant to this duty to negotiate, where a past practice between a public employer and its current employees is established, involving a mandatory subject of negotiation, the Taylor Law would bar the employer from discontinuing that practice without prior negotiation" (Matter of Aeneas McDonald Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Geneva, 92 NY2d 326, 331), and "PERB is authorized to determine disputes as to improper employment practices, and to take affirmative… [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
"Pursuant to this duty to negotiate, where a past practice between a public employer and its current employees is established, involving a mandatory subject of negotiation, the Taylor Law would bar the employer from discontinuing that practice without prior negotiation" (Matter of Aeneas McDonald Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Geneva, 92 NY2d 326, 331), and "PERB is authorized to determine disputes as to improper employment practices, and to take affirmative… [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 5:30 am
Brown and Biden v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 11:43 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 3:41 pm
ShareThe argument Tuesday in Cantero v. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 3:00 am
Ed. 2d 539 (1993); see also, PGBA, LLC v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 3:30 am
Initially the Association's motion to compel arbitration was granted by the Supreme Court but subsequently an amended order was issued staying arbitration based on the court's finding that the Taylor Law agreement did not bind the district to arbitrate disputes between the Association and a third party, here the "BOCES Plan" administrators. [read post]
