Search for: "Thomas v. Big "
Results 221 - 240
of 1,809
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am
Press Gazette research suggests that Britain’s largest publishers could receive up to £250m a year from Google and Meta if the UK passes an Australian-style law obliging Big Tech to negotiate cash-for-content deals with broadcasters like the BBC, newspapers and non-newspaper publishers. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
” The latter words (“by each state”) would (according to the three Justices) have left it up to each State to decide which state organs get to do the regulating.But Petitioners (and Justices Alito, Thomas, and Gorsuch) would be advised to read more carefully before they write: Article II (whose meaning they say tracks Article I’s) does (to answer what the Justices Alito, Thomas, and Gorsuch observed) confer responsibility onto “each state. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 5:00 am
Both Sides Flip Flop on Common Carriage Ever since Justice Thomas used his concurrence in 2021’s Biden v. [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm
Data Privacy and Data Protection Four years after the enforcement of the EU GDPR, data regulators are struggling to act quickly on complaints against Big Tech and pending enforcement decisions are still waiting. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:08 pm
On 17 May 2022, judgment was handed down in Wright v Granath [2022] EWHC 1181 (QB) by Lewis J. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:56 pm
Corpus linguistics Koppelman trains some of his fire on corpus linguistics, which "relies upon recently developed techniques of analyzing big databases of texts of the founding period. . . . [read post]
10 May 2022, 12:49 pm
And two of those nine—Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch—have argued that the Supreme Court should reconsider New York Times v. [read post]
7 May 2022, 8:20 am
That's news, but it ain't big news, because there wasn't a whole lot of uncertainty surrounding those outcomes to begin with. [read post]
6 May 2022, 7:36 am
Justice Stevens repeatedly disagreed with him; he insisted that Chevron did not make any big change in the law, and that questions of law were for courts, not agencies. [read post]
3 May 2022, 1:32 am
Blame Biden for confirming Clarence Thomas. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm
On Friday 29 April 2022 there was a hearing in the case of Vardy v Rooney. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 7:54 am
Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
These attacks on affirmative action are somewhat conventional, inasmuch as the Court has decided at least three big cases on this question already this century—Grutter v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
Thank you Hal [Scott] for that kind introduction and for inviting me to speak today. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 9:15 am
In American Library Association v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 5:45 am
Oklahoma v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 6:15 pm
Share“John the Tiger Man,” a hypothetical dangerous prisoner invented by Justice Stephen Breyer, featured prominently in Tuesday’s oral argument in Shoop v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 12:55 pm
(Big, if true.) [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 6:57 am
ShareMonday’s argument in Siegel v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 2:36 pm
Seuss Enterprises, L.P. v. [read post]
