Search for: "U. S. Patent and Trademark Office" Results 221 - 240 of 390
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2016, 1:57 pm by Michael Froomkin
Alcoba is a sole practitioner who focuses mainly on patent, trademark and immigration law. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 1:57 pm by Michael Froomkin
Alcoba is a sole practitioner who focuses mainly on patent, trademark and immigration law. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 6:17 pm by Ron Coleman
In that prosecution, the United States Patent and Trademark Office had initially refused registration because other financial institutions had already registered loyalt [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 11:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Thus, for example, the use of orange safety vests on a construction site would appear to be encompassed by the registered marks—something that would no doubt come as a surprise to thousands of contractors.How Cedar Valley was able to persuade the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) to register such marks is a mystery, particularly given that Cedar Valley has used only particular shades of orange; used it only on shirts, lawn signs, and a few… [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 6:00 am by Steve Baird
As always, stay tuned, as it turns out, UPS’ United Problem Solvers federal trademark applications may be refused registration by the USPTO (another initialism, not acronym, for United States Patent and Trademark Office) based on another’s prior pending trademark application for Problem Solvers in connection with highly similar services: “Freight logistics management; Transportation logistics services, namely, arranging the… [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 8:50 am by Marie-Helene Rochon
Le 11 janvier 2016, le United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) a déclaré une interférence entre les deux groupes, c. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 9:33 pm by Mark Summerfield
As has been widely reported, the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has instituted interference proceedings to determine who is entitled to own foundational patent rights in relation to CRISPR/Cas9 ‘gene editing’ technology. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 5:51 pm by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Vidal Font has procured trademark applications and represented clients before the United States Patent & Trademark Office and the Puerto Rico Trademark Office, and has litigated intellectual property matters both at the state and federal levels. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 8:12 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
En los Estados Unidos, las patentes son otorgadas por el United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) a todo inventor que demuestre que su invención resulta ser útil, novel y no-obvia. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:30 am by Steve Brachmann
Patent and Trademark Office in 2014, placing it 88th overall among all companies petitioning the USPTO for patents that year; this figure was an incredible 47 percent higher than Caterpillar’s 2013 U.S. patent levels. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 11:58 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) has only chosen to fully institute proceedings 41 times, or in 47% of cases. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 6:00 am by Duets Guest Blogger
- Draeke Weseman, Weseman Law Office, PLLC Intellectual property enforcement continues to make news, and new solutions to curb abusive enforcement – i.e. trademark bullying, patent trolling, and copyright trolling – are being proposed regularly. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 3:05 pm
The Examiner referred to MPEP 2173.05(u) , which directed the Examiner to reject a claim as indefinite when a trademark was used to identify a product. [read post]
27 May 2015, 3:41 pm
 They can prove that the patent is invalid as an affirmative defence,  file a declaratory judgment requesting the court to declare the patent invalid (MedImmune v Genetech (2007)), seek inter partes review at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board or seek ex parte rexamination at the Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 7:08 am
The Examiner referred to MPEP 2173.05(u) , which directed the Examiner to reject a claim as indefinite when a trademark was used to identify a product. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 11:59 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Patent and Trademark Office in a letter to declare the patent invalid because it would "impair the functionality" of the web causing "substantial economic and technical damage to (its) operation. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 1:12 pm by Dennis Crouch
 The general holding is that a final decision by the US Patent & Trademark Offices Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) can serve as issue preclusion to collaterally estop a court from re-judging already-decided issues. [read post]