Search for: "U. S. v. Certain"
Results 221 - 240
of 2,668
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2010, 7:34 am
Finally, on December 13, the Court denied certiorari in Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
The court said that “The record is clear that [Murray] was deprived of her substantial rights in the review process culminating in her U-rating when measured against the methodology followed in other such case, citing Cohn v Board of Education, 102 AD3d 586. [read post]
19 May 2018, 2:38 pm
Bank N.A. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:00 pm
This post explores the Third Circuit’s decision, Sanofi Adventis v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 9:47 am
Supreme Court unanimously held in Allen v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 7:56 am
” The Ninth Circuit instead found that the Supreme Court’s 1983 holding in Dirks v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 6:00 am
U-Haul Co. of California (2006) 143 Cal.App.4th 796, 802-803 [plaintiff alleged he was required to purchase excess fuel when returning rental truck]; Monarch Plumbing Co. v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 2:00 am
Woodson, 444 U. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 4:53 pm
S. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 1:32 pm
Co. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 8:26 am
No. 1 v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 3:15 am
in Strumwasser v Zeiderman ; 2012 NY Slip Op 30772(U) March 15, 2012 ;Supreme Court, New York County ; Docket Number: 113524/2010; Judge: Joan A. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:43 am
Although the Justices were unanimous in upholding the lower court decision, the Justices differed on certain points, resulting in three separate opinions. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 6:26 pm
Van Dyke v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 4:27 am
Grace v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 5:46 am
The Board dismissed UK's fraud claim and granted the applicant's motion to amend its use-based application to delete certain goods for which the mark had not been used. [read post]
27 May 2009, 5:28 pm
U. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 11:08 am
S., at 7, n. 3; Board of Regents, 468 U. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 12:00 pm
Next were aerial diagrams of the several blocks leading up to the finish line; Grilk identified certain stores and major structures along this path. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 5:00 am
With the ever growing number of recent high profile cases involving tripartite contracts (including Loyalty Management, Baxi, WHA, Adecco and U-Drive) the UKSC’s decision will hopefully provide some much needed clarity in this increasingly confusing area of law and provide a definitive summary to the VAT implications of tripartite contracts. [read post]
