Search for: "U. S. v. Choice" Results 221 - 240 of 1,009
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2011, 3:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Cruciata v Mainiero ;2011 NY Slip Op 50066(U) ;Decided on January 14, 2011 ;Supreme Court, New York County ;James, J. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:51 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
  That much was expected by virtually all observers – after all, as the Justices recognized during oral argument, it’s hard to understand why Australia’s regulatory choices should be displaced by U.S. law in a case involving Australian investors, an Australian issuer, and an Australian exchange. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 2:06 pm by George Wilson
The International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 (IRF Act) defines five types of violations of religious freedom: arbitrary prohibitions on, restrictions of, or punishment for (i) assembling for peaceful religious activities, such as worship, preaching, and prayer, including arbitrary registration requirements; (ii) speaking freely about one’s religious beliefs; (iii) changing one’s religious beliefs and affiliation; (iv) possession and distribution of religious… [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In Jonns v Fischbarg  2019 NY Slip Op 31919(U) July 3, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 150729/2017 Judge Kathryn Freed gives a nice cogent explanation of two recurring legal malpractice principles. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In Jonns v Fischbarg  2019 NY Slip Op 31919(U) July 3, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 150729/2017 Judge Kathryn Freed gives a nice cogent explanation of two recurring legal malpractice principles. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 2:37 pm by Eugene Volokh
Choice of precedent One of the chief curiosities of the decision is its choice of precedent. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 1:57 pm
  That approach was also affirmed by the current Supreme Court in the ITW v. [read post]