Search for: "U. S. v. Green" Results 221 - 240 of 426
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2024, 2:49 pm by Harbir Deol
   Non-U.S. persons could qualify under this definition if such person is a lawful permanent resident (i.e., having a green card) or otherwise meeting the “substantial presence test” for residency in the U.S. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:36 am by Pace Law School Library
Illinois’s first attempt at sustainable building is green for all the wrong reasons. 35 S. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 4:54 am
(Why on God's green earth a defendant would ever do this, I don't know. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 10:41 am by Peter Margulies
Finally, the proclamation excepts members of the U.S. armed forces and treaty investors, who receive a green card after substantial investments in U.S. businesses. [read post]
2 May 2008, 10:20 am
The Court issued two opinions with today’s order list, the long-discussed case Perry Homes v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am by INFORRM
The claimants argue that the delay in filing the claims resulted from the newspaper’s concealment of its staff’s behaviour. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 10:38 am by Pace Law Library
Enabling urban sprawl: revisiting the Supreme Court’s seminal zoning decision Euclis v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:14 am
Things Remembered (Patently-O)   US Copyright – Decisions Ninth Circuit rules that Bratz maker MGA Entertainment can continue selling its dolls despite having lost copyright infringement suit last year: MGA Entertainment v Mattel (IPKat)   US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Beyonce - Destiny’s Child and Beyonce settle Cater 2 U copyright dispute: Allen v Destiny’s Child (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) (Chicago… [read post]