Search for: "U. S. v. Holder" Results 221 - 240 of 559
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2017, 6:24 am by David Post
Although we agree that “the Government’s interest in combating terrorism is an urgent objective of the highest order,” Holder v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:53 am by Kevin Johnson
Holder, the justices found that a lawful permanent resident’s conviction for possession of a small amount of marijuana – now legal in many states – did not mandate removal. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 10:54 am by Florian Mueller
ZTE [...].a) The Chamber [= panel] outlined its interpretation of the CJEU opinion in Huawei v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 3:18 am by Peter Mahler
A 1998 trial court decision in A&A Properties NY Ltd. v Soundings Condominium broke new ground by granting the unit holders application to inspect the list. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 1:22 am by Jani Ihalainen
Not often discussed, cases dealing directly with exhaustion seem to be far and few between; however, the Court of Justice of the EU recently took on a case dealing with a question that is important in the context of software exhaustion.The case of Aleksandrs Ranks and Jurijs Vasiļevičs v Finanšu un ekonomisko noziegumu izmeklēšanas prokoratūra and Microsoft Corp deals with two Latvian individuals who sold Microsoft software products online… [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 11:28 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The U-visa program offers temporary nonimmigrant status to victims of substantial physical or mental abuse and U-visa holders may apply for a “green card” after three years. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 6:42 am by Joy Waltemath
U visas generally entitle their holders and their families to four years of nonimmigrant status; holders may also apply for a “green card” after three years. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 1:41 pm by Evan M. Levow
” DWI is not considered a “crime of violence,” according to the Supreme Court’s decision in Leocal v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 1:41 pm by Evan M. Levow
” DWI is not considered a “crime of violence,” according to the Supreme Court’s decision in Leocal v. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 3:33 am by Peter Mahler
If, as appears likely, the drafters of the LLC membership interest repurchase provisions at issue in Saleeby v Remco Maintenance, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 31447(U) [Sup Ct NY County July 25, 2016], thought they were helping the company avoid the possibility of litigation over the value assigned to the outgoing member’s interest, as it turns out they were sorely mistaken. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 12:59 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Florida International University Board of Trustees v. [read post]