Search for: "U. S. v. King"
Results 221 - 240
of 543
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Hence, the plaintiff in McRitchie v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 3:46 am
Mitchell, 17 Misc 3d 1103A [Crim Ct, Kings County 2007], citing People v. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 8:01 pm
S. 688, 696 (1993); Cooke v. [read post]
29 Apr 2007, 6:51 am
State v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:53 am
King Packing Co. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 10:33 am
U. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm
The Fredericksburg Care Company LP v. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 6:53 pm
” We review a district court’s claim construction de novo, Apple Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 3:00 am
“U-K-A-S-E. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 4:54 am
Tradesman Program Managers LLC v Doyle, 2020 NY Slip Op 32452[U] [Sup Ct, Kings County 2020]; Barrison v D’Amato & Lynch, LLP, 2019 NY Slip Op 30905[U] [Sup Ct, NY County]; Lentini v 219 W. 20th St. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 6:47 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 8:17 am
(NYC Civil, Kings Co., decided 9/15/08); Lenox Hill Radiology, PC, a/a/o Busanet v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:01 am
That's an admirable goal of all concerned in the litigation process. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 11:41 am
Gordon & Assoc., P.C. v Rascio, 12 Misc 3d 131[A], 2006 NY Slip Op 51055[U] [App Term, 2d & 11th Jud Dists 2006]; see also Pisacreta v Minniti, 265 AD2d 540 [1999]). [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 5:45 am
S., at 693; see United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In dissent in Petrella v. [read post]
6 Nov 2022, 1:09 am
A week of U-turns, from the Government on COP27 and from within the Church of England on same-sex marriage… …culminating with today’s announcement from No 10 that “The Prime Minister has decided to proclaim an additional bank holiday to mark the Coronation of His Majesty King Charles III next year”. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 5:17 pm
Anonymity In the case of Thomas S. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 10:00 am
For the right to the great Writ extended as far as the King's power. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 4:25 am
TTAB Affirmed 2(e)(1) Refusal of ICE BLIND as Merely Descriptive of Ice Fishing HousesTTAB Affirms Disclaimer Requirement of “KING” in KING LIVING & Design for Furniture and Bed-Related Goods and ServicesSection 2(e)(2) - Primarily Geographically Descriptive:TTAB Reverses Disclaimer Requirement: ANAHEIM Not Geographically Descriptive of ClothingTwin TTAB Test: Is ALLEN HOTEL Confusable With ETHAN ALLEN for Lodging Services? [read post]