Search for: "U.S. v. Fletcher*"
Results 221 - 240
of 514
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2007, 12:32 pm
The brother did a variety of things, and got some money from the U.S. government, but then -- and this is what gave rise to the appeal -- sought to attach a $2.8 million judgment that Iran had obtained in the ICC against Cubic (for, not surprisingly, refusing to deliver weapons to the new government after the Iranian revolution).I'll spare you the complicated procedural history (including a trip up to the Supremes), though it's actually an interesting case. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 6:53 pm
(“Kingston”) ap peals the U.S. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 3:20 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 11:51 am
(Orin Kerr) Back in 2009, I blogged about United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
Ch.) and some practical analysis of the consequences of the case publicly circulated by leading U.S. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 11:14 am
To the tune of over two billion dollars.This is admittedly a somewhat unusual case, and involves plaintiffs who sued Iran -- successfully -- for sponsoring the 1983 bombing of the U.S. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 9:00 pm
Partnership v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 8:53 am
Stanley v. [read post]
Interpreting plant provisions of the ESA, 9th Circuit shows restraint, encourages FWS to adopt rules
31 Aug 2010, 5:01 pm
” Steel Co. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:53 pm
The Court in Johnson v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 2:40 pm
Fletcher International, Ltd. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 3:19 pm
Fletcher, U.S. [read post]
10 Aug 2019, 4:34 am
He also shared the Department of Justice’s amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 10:07 am
" Plaintiffs say that it's not the "high seas" because it's within the expanded U.S. territorial limits. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 4:47 pm
Sessoms v. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
Sam Rayburn and the U.S. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 12:18 pm
., the court will hear oral arguments in Big Lagoon Rancheria v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 7:49 pm
Supreme Court's decision in Smith v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 3:54 pm
To take but one example: In describing and distinguishing the Supreme Court's arguably controlling 1995 opinion, which allowed the employee to sue (albeit with reduced damages), Judge Wardlaw describes the case in the following manner:"But McKennon was a case in which the defendant conceded it had unlawfully discriminated against the plaintiff on the basis of age and was attempting to use after-acquired evidence of wrongdoing to assert that the plaintiff would have been… [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 9:00 pm
Lonza Group AG v. [read post]
