Search for: "UNIFORM DISTRICT COURT RULES" Results 221 - 240 of 3,030
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2013, 12:34 pm by Erik B. von Zeipel
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia recently denied a motion to dismiss a counterclaim for violation of Virginia’s Uniform Trade Secrets Act (“VUTSA”), holding that the counterclaim sufficiently alleged trade secret misappropriation based on improper acquisition of a trade secret, even in the absence of allegations of use or disclosure. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 3:57 am by Tom Bolt
Uniform law commissioners are appointed by every state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 9:01 am by Ronald Mann
On that point, she drew a distinction between “uniform laws allowing for local determination of governing rules,” which are quite common in the bankruptcy arena, and the statute here. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 12:12 am
The state commission that kept the guidelines current no longer exists and that makes considering them a pointless exercise, the District 2 Court of Appeals said. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Section 2(a) of the Uniform Arbitration Act contemplates a summary proceeding in which the court substantively disposes of the issues presented. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 3:03 am
In a recent ruling from the Northern District of California: Two themes emerge in the analysis that follows. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 6:15 am by Bill Hector
Damages discovery in patent cases is usually contentious, expensive, and non-uniform in application by the courts. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 10:50 am by Sheppard Mullin
The District Court’s Analysis in Denying Certification The district court began its analysis for class certification by examining whether the plaintiff had established commonality under Rule 23(a)(2) based on the standards announced in Dukes v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 5:00 am by John Ikard
Accordingly, the court affirmed the district court’s ruling and dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim. [read post]
17 May 2017, 2:00 am by NCC Staff
Warren also made it clear he would work with the justices to find “unanimity and uniformity, even if we have some differences. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 2:30 pm by Matt C. Bailey
But a court can never be assured that a plaintiff will prevail on a given legal theory prior to a dispositive ruling on the merits, and a full inquiry into the merits of a putative class's legal claims is precisely what both the Supreme Court and we have cautioned is not appropriate for a Rule 23 certification inquiry. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 1:17 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
District Court for The Eastern District of Texas claiming that LG had infringed on its backlight module patents used in televisions and monitors. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 11:01 am by Jonathan Moss
Sept. 12, 2019), the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit reversed a New Jersey district court ruling, which held that the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 (“SLUSA”) precluded state law claims in lawsuits brought by investors who opted-out of class action lawsuits. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 7:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit upheld a district court order granting a preliminary injunction against Ohio’s new election rules. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 2:04 pm by Mary E. Hodges
Circuit Court of Appeals seeking to overturn a District Court’s ruling that barred the agency from ordering the Securities Investor Protection Corp. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 1:30 pm by Dan Hoerner
 Batterton overturned rulings by a federal district court in California and the U.S. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 1:30 pm by Dan Hoerner
 Batterton overturned rulings by a federal district court in California and the U.S. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 12:41 pm by Jesse Salen and Rebecca Edelson
  The new law, which mostly tracks the UTSA, provides civil remedies in federal district courts for trade secret misappropriation. [read post]
The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the district court’s ruling with respect to whether Mama Jo’s suffered “direct physical loss. [read post]
7 May 2007, 4:49 pm
., 1-06-1533 (2/13/07), the same First District Court of Appeals (but a different panel) decided to overlook a party's lack of citation to authority in its spoliation of evidence argument and rejected a waiver argument. [read post]