Search for: "United States v. AT&T, Inc." Results 221 - 240 of 7,887
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2011, 5:51 pm by Marty Lederman
 I suspect it never enjoyed a United States copyright--which makes it an even more apt hypothetical in the context of Golan.] [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 12:30 pm
Mercy Hospital, Inc., civil action no. 05-22409, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:00 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
It also dismissed the complaint against the state appellees after concluding that, under United Jewish Organizations of Williamsburgh, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 6:01 am by Jon Robinson
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its opinion in Talk America, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 6:01 am by Jon Robinson
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its opinion in Talk America, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:42 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The United States District Court for the SouthernDistrict of Indiana held two bench trials, one on infringementand one on invalidity. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 11:40 am by Native American Rights Fund
NY State Dep't of Financial Services (Internet loans, Commerce Clause) United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 11:00 pm
# # #DECISIONGold Town Corp. v United Parcel Servs., Inc. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 5:51 pm
Lit., the Court states that “[t]here is neither a bar nor a presumption against appointing foreign entities to serve as lead plaintiff, particularly where, as here, the defendant is a U.S. company and the foreign entities bought their shares in the United States”, in effect dismissing the res judicata concerns raised by other movants in relation to the appointment of a foreign entity as lead plaintiff. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 9:24 am by Kara Elgersma, Of Counsel
CVS Pharmacy, Inc., United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, No. 11-1251, May 20, 2011 Opinion at 5. [read post]
22 May 2014, 10:07 am by Craig Whitney
The doctrine of laches cannot be invoked as a bar to a plaintiff’s claim for damages brought within the Copyright Act’s three-year statute of limitations period, according to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Petrella v. [read post]