Search for: "United States v. DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF I. & N."
Results 221 - 240
of 349
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2010, 6:42 am
Most importantly, it was this principle that drove the United States Supreme Court to famously observe in Wilko v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am
(PatLit) UK Supreme Court – The final battle in Star Wars copyright dispute (IP Osgoode) United States US Patent Reform The time for global harmonisation is now: so says David Kappos, Director of the USPTO (IPKat) Kappos seeks to fight patent reform opposition with facts (IAM) Why the Americans should leave Europe out of their first-to-invent debate – UPDATED (IAM) House debates patent reform – H. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 11:32 am
” There was a separate succession order “[i]n case of the Secretary’s death, resignation, or inability to perform the functions of the Office. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 7:12 am
There are many ways that a non-citizen can enter the United States. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 3:22 am
Longmont United Hospital Ass’n, 14 F.3d 526, 531 (“[i]solated comments, unrelated to the challenged action, are insufficient to show discriminatory animus in termination decisions. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 9:45 am
She claimed they repeatedly engaged in offensive and threatening behavior, including calling biracial couples “n***er lovers” and biracial kids “half n***er” (Maddox v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 4:11 am
Edmead in Siegel v Eisner is only the second time in this blog’s 13-year history that I’ve had occasion to feature a dissolution case involving an NFP (here’s the first time). [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
Judge Rothstein is not only a respected federal trial judge, she was the director of the Federal Judicial Center, which produces the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:31 am
Then they were standing at the door to the police investigative analysis unit. [read post]
30 May 2022, 9:00 pm
” United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 9:15 am
Hopkins, UNITED STATES: TAKING A STAND (OR NOT): NEW ETHICS RULE COULD COMPROMISE YOUR EXPERT'S TESTIMONY, Mondaq Article ID: 48664***David I. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 6:41 pm
See, Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Ass’n v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 11:14 am
In HKSAR v. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 8:07 pm
Universal (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) US Copyright Group – ‘Put up or shut up’ time for US Copyright Group (Ars Technica) (TorrentFreak) US Copyright Group – Class action lawsuit challenges Bittorent lawsuit factory’s business model (Internet Cases) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Decisions District Court E D Virginia: Awards domain holder common law trademark right & orders registrar to return domains: Weitzman v Lead Networks… [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:54 am
And a federal court has recently agreed, because on April 10, 2014, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California ruled that A’lor is barred from infringing CHARRIOL cable trademarks by selling ALOR jewelry that uses such cable. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(Afro-IP) Spain Trade mark cancellation and damages: a matter of (bad) faith (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC (Pat): No ruling on hypothetical issue: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (PatLit) EWHC: Trial judge says ‘Boileau’ to patent licence; appeal court agrees: Oxonica Energy Ltd v… [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:25 am
i Muzicologilor din România – Asocia? [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:58 am
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Blog) US Patents – Decisions Split Federal Circuit panel finds preamble language not limiting: Marrin v Griffin (GRAY on Claims) (Inventive Step) District Court E D Texas: Inequitable conduct expert could not testify as to materiality absent qualification as a person skilled in the art: Advanced Technology Incubator, Inc v Sharp Corporation et al (Docket Report) District Court N D California: Intracompany… [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 9:49 am
The changes were intended to further harmonize the various data protection laws currently in place in the EU member states, protect personal data “[i]n today’s new, challenging digital environment,”[2] and “make Europe fit for the digital age. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 9:03 am
District Judge William H. [read post]
