Search for: "United States v. Frye"
Results 221 - 240
of 240
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2014, 4:27 am
United States, unpublished Sixth Circuit decision regarding prejudice under the Lafler and Frye decisions, that made it onto Doug Berman’s radar at Sentencing Law & Policy. [read post]
8 May 2007, 5:27 am
The following is a glossary of a broad list of legal terms, civil and criminal, state and federal and not just those in a divorce or family law case. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 4:50 pm
United States, 293 F. 1013(D.C.Cir.1923)…The Frye standard….dictates that scientific evidence is only admissible at trial if the methodology or scientific principle upon which the opinion is based is sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance in the particular field in which it belongs. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 7:46 am
Green & Joseph Sanders, “Admissibility Versus Sufficiency: Controlling the Quality of Expert Witness Testimony in the United States,” (March 5, 2012) <downloaded on March 25, 2012>. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 3:51 pm
And cases like United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:08 pm
”[1] A number of recent, post-Frye[2] Board decisions start with this statement, or a similar allocation of burden of proof. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 5:46 pm
United States USA today had a piece “Rudy Giuliani’s ‘Borat 2’ scene: What can he do about it legally? [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 2:19 pm
Rates of C. difficile, the most common hospital-based infection in the United States, continue to climb. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 12:49 pm
As held in the case of People v Grinberg, chemical analysis is necessary for a prosecution under Vehicle and Traffic Law for driving while ability is impaired by drugs. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 3:36 am
United States. [read post]
11 Apr 2020, 5:16 am
Defendant 3M moved to exclude plaintiffs’ causation expert witnesses, in its Minnesota state court cases, under the so-called Frye standard. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am
United Airlines, Inc., 17 Fed. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:06 am
See Ralph Klier v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
It is very rarely permitted, since the American system of justice is premised upon an open system in which, whenever one side wants to communicate with the Court, it has to give prior notice to the other side, so that they too will have an opportunity to be heard.).The "ex parte" order would give the RIAA permission to take "immediate discovery" -- before the defendants have been served or given notice -- which authorizes the issuance of subpoenas to the ISP's asking for the… [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 3:05 pm
United States, 121 U.S.App. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Frye, The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 9:41 am
Frye, The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 10:04 am
”13 Mandatory Not Precatory The better reasoned cases decided under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, and state-court analogues, follow the Reference Manual in making clear that confounding factors must be carefully addressed and eliminated. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm
Brock v. [read post]
