Search for: "United States v. Garcia" Results 221 - 240 of 825
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2017, 1:15 pm by Christopher Wilkinson
  Judge Mazzant rejected this argument finding that the Supreme Court’s decision in Garcia v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 10:31 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Garcia wrote that the “overwhelming” evidence suggested that SB 4 would “erode public trust and make communities less safe. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 7:39 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Williamson (Federal Tort Claims Act; Personal Injuries)Garcia v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 1:02 pm by Kevin Johnson
Based on the convictions, the immigration court and the Board of Immigration Appeals ordered Dimaya removed from the United States. [read post]
31 May 2017, 3:36 pm by Shea Denning
The United States Supreme Court vacated the Ninth Circuit’s judgment in Mendez yesterday, rejecting, in a unanimous opinion, the Ninth Circuit’s provocation rule as incompatible with the high court’s excessive force jurisprudence. [read post]
24 May 2017, 3:16 am by Michael Lowe
  The Supreme Court of the United States defined what is considered illegal obscenity in what has become known as “the Miller test” from Miller v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 11:24 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Affinity appealed to thiscourt and the Director of the United States Patent andTrademark Office (Director) intervened. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 11:28 am
Today, over 850,000 sex offenders are registered throughout the United States. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 1:42 pm by Eugene Volokh
The district court order stated that “the Court directed the file be sent to the United States Attorney for investigation”; Levy’s post states that Ruddie is in the final stages of plea bargaining with the United States Attorney for the District of Rhode Island; we understand that his obligations will extend to getting phony consent orders lifted in two dozen other cases besides those involving Myvesta. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 11:54 am by Kevin Russell
Elite Logistics, Inc., in 2007, the 10th Circuit sat en banc to review discrimination claims by an employee who alleged that his employer suspended him from work until he produced documentation of his right to work in the United States, and then fired him after he produced the documentation and demanded an apology. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 6:49 am
During her forensic interview, A.S. stated that she attempted to delete some of the pornographic images that she found.Marsh v. [read post]