Search for: "United States v. Job" Results 221 - 240 of 8,256
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2014, 7:41 am by David Russcol
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court ruled that, under federal law, employees only have to be paid for time spent working or on activities necessary to perform their jobs – even if their employers require them to be there longer. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 2:51 pm by Brian Shyr
United States Department of Homeland Security are getting tired of waiting. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 6:07 am by Kent Scheidegger
  At no time was the United States Government or any federal official a party to any action.The particular proceeding that came to the Supreme Court as Medellin v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 11:20 am by Lyle Denniston
  The new case denied Tuesday was United Airlines v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 2:06 pm by Mashel Law, L.L.C.
The issue of whether an employee has suffered a requisite “adverse employment action” under our state’s whistleblower law when transferred out of his longstanding job into another after he blows the whistle on his employer’s violations of law or public policy, was recently addressed by the New Jersey Appellate Division in Jeffrey Scozzafava v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 2:06 pm by Mashel Law, L.L.C.
The issue of whether an employee has suffered a requisite “adverse employment action” under our state’s whistleblower law when transferred out of his longstanding job into another after he blows the whistle on his employer’s violations of law or public policy, was recently addressed by the New Jersey Appellate Division in Jeffrey Scozzafava v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 3:53 pm by Adam Kielich
This month the Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral arguments on Sandifer v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 12:02 pm by Steven Boutwell
Dept. of Labor, (5th Cir. 2010) the United States Fifth Circuit upheld the award of workers compensation benefits to an undocumented immigrant worker who was injured on the job as a pipefitter. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 3:18 am by rhall@initiativelegal.com
In a stinging rebuke to recent Supreme Court decisions that demonstrate an implicit faith in arbitration, United States District Judge Max O. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 10:47 am
I can't think of a less sympathetic non-criminal case than this one.The Cheungs get indicted for conspiracy to defraud the United States and tax fraud. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
USERRA is a federal statute that says that when members of the armed forces of the United States--typically reservists called to active duty--are risking their lives to defend the rest of us, they shouldn't lose their jobs as a consequence. [read post]