Search for: "United States v. Levinson"
Results 221 - 240
of 271
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2017, 6:00 am
Hearstand Yakus v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable onVoting Rights, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022.Sanford Levinson First I must express my continued thanks to the persons actually behind this remarkable project, Richard Albert, Ashley Moran, and Trish Do. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 1:42 pm
Connecticut and Roe v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:00 am
Apple also might benefit from directors who reside outside the United States. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
Sherwin, Gambling with Armageddon: Nuclear Roulette from Hiroshima to the Cuban Missile Crisis (Knopf, 2020).February 7, 2021Balkinization Symposium on Mary Ziegler, Abortion and the Law in America: Roe v. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 4:20 am
In accordance with Basic v. [read post]
14 Jul 2007, 12:06 pm
Democrats were very upset at Bush v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 2:36 pm
Connecticut and Roe v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 2:01 pm
It is unprecedented in 49 prior trials and depositions where I have testified, in federal and state courts all over the United States, including many cases in Texas. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:28 am
United States, by a vote of six to three, the Court held that a federal district court has the discretion to order a federal criminal sentence to run after a state criminal sentence that is anticipated but has not yet been imposed. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 1:35 am
Chamber of Commerce of the United States and the National Association of Manufacturers filed an amicus brief in support of the company’s petition. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 4:44 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 4:44 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:16 am
United States (here), the Supreme Court recognized a presumption of reliance on an omission of material fact by a party with a duty to disclosure that information. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 7:30 am
Or consider another example: in United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:03 am
Only the United States can take actions such as regime change. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Sanford Levinson This post was prepared for a roundtable onCan this Constitution be Saved? [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
“Not since Bush v. [read post]
23 Jan 2016, 10:50 am
It is imposed as a positive duty on the United States. [read post]
