Search for: "United States v. Lucas" Results 221 - 240 of 289
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Socially Aware blog had a post on regulatory developments affecting social media use  in the United States. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Pruitt, No. 06-6002 Given the particular characteristics of North Carolina sentencing law, in light of recent United States Supreme Court precedent, in determining whether to apply the career offender provision of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, a federal court must take into account the defendant's state criminal history (or lack thereof) at the time of his predicate North Carolina convictions. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
United States Hanna Bouveng has been awarded $18 million damages against her former employer Benjamin Wey by a US federal jury. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 9:02 pm by Fernanda G. Nicola
Even if other nations initially viewed the Italian model with suspicion, it has since become a blueprint for many European nations and the United States. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 9:23 am by Eugene Volokh
Unlike the state supreme court decision in Rickert v. [read post]
4 Sep 2021, 6:25 am by Russell Knight
Evid. 609 Impeachment For Bias In An Illinois Divorce Hearing Or Trial “The confrontation clause of the sixth amendment of the United States Constitution (U.S. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
By contrast, in the United States (see Firth v New York, 747 NYS 2d 69 (2002)) and in England (see the notes to section 8 of the Defamation Act 2013), the single-publication rule means a cause of action accrues only when the material is first accessed. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
He did, however, strike out the defendant’s Lucas-Box meanings on the ground that “advancing Lucas-Box meanings that are at variance with the actual meaning found by the Court is wrong in principle”. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:06 am by Colin Miller
Instead, according to the court, The United States Supreme Court has never held that rape-shield statutes do not represent a legitimate state interest, nor has it ever held that highly probative evidence will necessarily outweigh that interest. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 1:09 pm by Dan Ernst
Civil WarKalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu)Boats in a Storm: Law and Displacement in Postwar South AsiaEvan Taparata, University of Pennsylvania (taparata@sas.upenn.edu)State of Refuge: Refugee Law and the Modern United StatesAdnan Zulfiqar, Rutgers Law School (adnan.zulfiqar@rutgers.edu)Collective Duties in Islamic Law: The Moral Community, State Authority, and Ethical Speculation in the late 9th to the 14th… [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:17 am by Sanford Levinson
  A recent article by NYU law professor Richard Pildes suggested that several recent decisions by the United States Supreme Court, most notably Citizens United, fit the “counter-majoritarian” thesis to a tee. [read post]