Search for: "United States v. Siegel"
Results 221 - 240
of 245
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2010, 6:53 am
If ever there were justification for intrusive judicial review of constitutional provisions that protect “discrete and insular minorities,” United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
Civil WarKalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu) Boats in a Storm: Law and Displacement in Postwar South AsiaEvan Taparata, University of Pennsylvania (taparata@sas.upenn.edu) State of Refuge: Refugee Law and the Modern United StatesAdnan Zulfiqar, Rutgers Law School (adnan.zulfiqar@rutgers.edu) Collective Duties in Islamic Law: The Moral Community, State Authority, and Ethical Speculation in the late 9th to the 14th Centuries… [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:44 am
Question: In what may well be an unprecedented event in Supreme Court history, in his McCutcheon v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:33 am
So too, the lawyersof the late medieval ius commune in the 12th to 15th centuries, both before and after the advent of civic republicanism as usually defined, engaged in endless debates over the legal relationships among empire, monarchies like that of France, and the paradigmatic republican city-states of Italy and elsewhere. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
(In some cases, like United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 12:52 pm
These ongoing discussions have inspired numerous policy suggestions at the federal level, but the first legislative move occurred when North Carolina’s House of Representatives passed a bill banning state and local agencies from making ransomware payments. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Heirs of Superman’s creator Jerome Siegel win share of copyright with Time Warner: (IP Law360), (IPKat), (Public Knowledge), Delhi High Court recognizes, for the first time in India, the need to consider public interest in allowing or rejecting an order of injunction: (Indian Patent Oppositions), (Generic Pharmaceuticals… [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 11:16 am
United States and Obergefell v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am
Johnson forAmici Curiae United Trustee’s Association and California Mortgage Association.Leland Chan for Amicus Curiae California Bankers Association.I. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm
The rest of the United States has two types of policies. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am
Question: Based on your extensive research, do you think that Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong’s major take-away points (beyond United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm
THURSDAY The Rights Revolution in Action: The Transformation of State Institutions after the 1960sThu, 6/7: 8:00 AM—9:45 AM, Sheraton Centre Toronto, Forest Hill · Chair/Discussant—Sara Mayeux, Vanderbilt University · Ingraham v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 7:03 am
As I understand the state of play, this is like an oxymoron for Solum, but conventional wisdom for originalists. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 12:23 pm
Neil Siegel David W. [read post]
15 May 2019, 6:00 am
In ways that Jack Balkin has parsed as well as anyone (along with his Yale colleagues Reva Siegel and Robert Post), the Constitution stands for political legitimacy, the possible unity of law and justice, and a normative national identity. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 11:23 am
Kronk's ex-wife (and a Chief in the United States Coast Guard), who states (1) he was interested in fanta [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Click Here Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 11:00 pm
It must be an account of why changes in constitutional doctrine over time- which largely occur outside of Article V amendment and are not in the control of any single person, much less any single judge- are legitimate. [read post]
