Search for: "United States v. State of Mont." Results 221 - 240 of 380
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2009, 4:42 am
., ;07 CV 8473 (GBD); UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK;2009 U.S. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 12:55 pm by Amy Howe
Halleck (Feb. 25): Whether the private operator of a public-access television channel is a “state actor” – that is, someone who is acting on behalf of the government — who can therefore be sued for violations of the First Amendment United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 9:11 am by South Florida Lawyers
But the judge is not done:  In my view, to affirm what happened here requires that we turn a blind eye to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, the Florida Bar Rules of Professional Conduct, and the Code of Judicial Conduct, to say nothing of the Constitutions of the United States and the State of Florida.Ok, but no traffic safety rules were violated, so it's not all bad. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:50 am by Aaron
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2011/01/04/09-50113.pdf United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 8:05 pm
Family Law Three-Card Monte – Limitations to Remedies Concerning Military Pension Benefits Being Shifted to VA Disability Benefits Under Cassinelli and Howell By: Michael C. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
Del Monte Corp., No. 09-12303, 2011 WL 87286, at *2–3 (E.D. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 1:31 pm
Baer, 973 P.2d 1225, 1231 (Colo. 1999).In the Interest of R.D., supra.The court then took up the First Amendment issue, explaining that theFirst Amendment of the United States Constitution provides that “Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm by Steve Sady
The debate between the majority and the concurring judges in Aguila-Montes de Oca (all agreed that the generic offense was not established) centered on whether the Ninth Circuit was straying from Taylor and its progeny by allowing a statute that is indivisible and “categorically broader than generic burglary” to be treated as generic burglary based on application of the modified categorical approach. [read post]