Search for: "United States v. United States Steel Corp" Results 221 - 240 of 404
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2012, 10:47 am
Steel Corp. concerned workers at an 800-employee United States Steel plant in Gary, Indiana, who complained about not being compensated for their time putting on and taking off required work clothes and walking from the locker room to their work stations and back. [read post]
7 May 2012, 6:00 am by Patrick Babin
Regarding Section 9 of the Act: one practice point to remember was that the statutory minimum for compensation does not apply to aliens and non-nationals of the United States or Canada pursuant to Section 9(g). [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
 The Ninth Circuit, in United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber Mfg., Energy, Allied Indus. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:46 am by George Truitt
Nov. 3, 2011), the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida addressed a trend recently observed in Florida courts with respect to claims for contribution. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
The same Google that forfeited $500 million to the United States government after it got caught assisting foreign pharmacies in importing illegal drugs thinks it’s OK to assist foreign rogue sites in the commission of online piracy. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:43 am by Brennan W. Bolt
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court declined to hear the employer's challenge in HTH Corp. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 8:12 am by Dr. Elliot J. Feldman
From 1986 until November 2006, U.S. law on the subject of non-market economies had been governed by a Court of Appeals decision, Georgetown Steel Corp. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 6:30 am
United States that the US CVD law didn't apply to NME imports - for a rehearing. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 4:24 pm
In the coming days, Congress is expected to consider and pass legislation responding to the ruling of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in GPX Int'l Tire Corp. v. [read post]