Search for: "W Walters" Results 221 - 240 of 773
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2017, 1:55 pm by Jon Sands
Walter-Eze, No. 15-50315 (8-25-17)(Amon w/Thomas; concurrence by Nguyen). [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 8:02 am by Mark Astarita
Poper, and the case is being supervised by Aaron W. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 6:52 am
Cristino, supra.The court then explained that[w]e compare the present case to two recent decisions by the Supr [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 1:42 pm
Ending the riot took the Michigan Army National Guard (sent in by Governor George W. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 7:06 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Sunlight Foundation: “Walter Shaub, director of the United States Office of Government Ethics, has resigned, saying the rules need to be tougher. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” In USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that “[w]hat’s different this time from past Supreme Court clashes is the existence of data-driven models to measure election results against other factors. [read post]
10 Jun 2017, 9:32 am by Schachtman
“The Slemp Case, Part I – Jury Verdict for Plaintiff – 10 Initial Observations” (May 13, 2017) The legal community is still trying to grasp the enormity of the $110M verdict against Johnson & Johnson, in the Slemp case. [read post]
23 May 2017, 9:30 am by Josh Blackman
Last week, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein appointed Robert S. [read post]
21 May 2017, 9:36 am by Steve Kalar
  Walter Liew worked with Chinese representatives to start a pigment plant there. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 4:27 am by SHG
But then I saw Walter Olson’s reply to a twit by some random fool. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 3:14 pm by Jordan Brunner
Walter Ruiz (for Hawsawi), Bormann and James Harrington (for Binalshibh) all ask for the same information. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 11:04 am by Emma Kohse
Judge Pohn sums up the government’s position: “[W]e give you what we have and the rest just doesn’t exist. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 6:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Walters, 309 F.3d 629 (9th Cir. 2002), struck down a federal policy which threatened doctors with revocation of their DEA prescription authority if they recommended the medicinal use of marijuana to their patients. [read post]