Search for: "W. T. Grant Co., Matter of"
Results 221 - 240
of 850
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2009, 12:57 pm
He held: On these facts, it does not matter whether (as Defendants urge) the reach of the Occupancy Tax is co-extensive with that of the state sales tax or whether Defendants “operate” hotels. [read post]
24 May 2007, 6:11 am
., et al. (05/18/2007): appeal of decisions granting judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) that the individual defendant was personally liable for inducement of infringement and denying JMOL that the jury's award of lost profits to the patentee was not supported by substantial evidence, and cross-appeal of the grant of summary judgment that the corporate defendant is not the alter ego of the individual defendant (reversed-in-part and affirmed-in-part); discussion of… [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 9:14 pm
—Tyler 1997, writ denied) (“[W]hen the trial court does not specify the specific grounds upon which it granted summary judgment, it is presumed that judgment was [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 2:02 pm
The decision, written by Chief Justice John Roberts and joined by Justices Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch, held that “[t]he President has lawfully exercised the broad discretion granted to him under [8 U.S.C.] [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 8:38 am
A post-issuance statement regardinga single element of a claimed invention does notestablish invalidity because “[w]e must consider thesubject matter sought to be patented taken as a whole. [read post]
13 May 2013, 8:43 am
But that is precisely what happened in Matter of Young decided earlier this year by Nassau County Surrogate Edward W. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 9:44 am
Co. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:18 am
Should treat right to copy as a co-equal participant in the system; otherwise competition simply retreats as rights expands. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 1:21 pm
Instead, the cost may be greater than the benefit if preliminary injunctions are granted routinely. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
Wyeth, 705 S.E.2d 828 (W. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 8:43 am
Ross Co., 232 N.J. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 6:01 am
. -- W. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 4:02 pm
So how does this matter to Katherine Jackson and the Canadian man she granted her approval to (in exchange for several hundred thousands of dollars, of course)? [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Hyster Co., 127 F.3d 649, 653-54 (8th Cir. 1997).Parts of the Third Restatement could apply in Arkansas, but there's a statute, and we don't like courts playing games with product liability statutes.CaliforniaOnce upon a time, California invented strict liability, and it hasn’t adopted either the Second or Third Restatement formulations. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 3:07 am
Nor can plaintiff prove that, but for Goldstein's failure to prosecute the underlying case for almost t w o years, Retail Corp.'s motion to vacate its default would not have been granted by Judge Rodriguez. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 6:03 am
The case arose from the Appellees, Kenneth W. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 8:19 am
Co. v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 12:21 pm
Co. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm
The expert witness at issue was an economist, Glen W. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 12:00 pm
Gov’t Employees Ins. [read post]
