Search for: "WILLIAMS v. SESSIONS" Results 221 - 240 of 784
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2014, 4:46 am
The judge then explains that on February 23, 2009, Scott and his then-counsel William Keefe were invited by the U.S. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 6:21 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The Court, consisting of Chief Justice Herb Yazzie, Associate Justice Eleanor Shirley, and Associate Justice by Designation William Platero, will hear oral argument in the case: Neptune Leasing, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 4:19 am by Perry S. Itkin, J.D., M.S.
District Court’s order relating to the confidentiality of mediation sessions, was held in contempt in the Memorandum Opinion in Williams, et al. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 11:10 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Hatim’s counsel, William Livingston, had a bit more to say. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 7:42 am
The first post-prandial session of IP and the Fashion Industry was opened by Antony Gold (HGF), taking a look at disputes involving the fashion sector. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 3:49 pm by Stephen Wermiel
The court also had a special session on September 9, 2009, to hear reargument in Citizens United v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 4:40 am
Zier, a state prosecutor in Wisconsin, was called out by Judge William Sosnay for wearing a red ascot to court. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 1:14 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Circuit affirms Judge Ricardo Urbina’s decision in Hatim v. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:53 am by Wolfgang Demino
Leonard, LEONARD LAW.Transworld Systems Incorporated, Defendant, represented by Damian Patrick Richard, SESSIONS FISHMAN NATHAN & ISRAEL, LLP.Patenaude and Felix, APC & Matthew Cheung, Defendants, represented by Marc Rosenberg, LEE SMART PS INC.ORDERJOHN C. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 12:00 pm by Karen Tani
How else would you learn about this new session? [read post]
18 May 2014, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
William White, gave prayers for Ash Wednesday and prayed seeking “the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ. [read post]
In particular, we argued that unlike prayers used to open legislative sessions at the state legislative level (one of which was upheld by the Supreme Court, largely on the basis of unbroken historical tradition, in Marsh v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In this setting, states and cities argue that the anti-commandeering principle prevents the feds from requiring state and local authorities to affirmatively provide information about or access to individuals who may have committed immigration law violations.Perhaps the most important Supreme Court case on this point is Printz v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 5:51 am
As the Court launches into its new session, major media outlets continue to roll out their previews of the term. [read post]