Search for: "Waterhouse v. State"
Results 221 - 240
of 310
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2015, 3:57 pm
In addition, some courts have recognized gender identity discrimination under a “sex-stereotyping” theory derived from Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 5:03 am
Creed v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 9:23 am
Macy v. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm
In 2013, the Court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:02 pm
The Court continued its work on this topic in the celebrated case of Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 5:02 pm
Supreme Court case from 1989: Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 11:30 am
That strategy helped secure the unanimous 1991 Supreme Court ruling in UAW v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:00 pm
This recalls to mind the scolding that Justice William Brennan gave to counsel for Price Waterhouse in the Supreme Court case of Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 4:13 am
The phrase “gender non-conformity” refers to the Supreme Court’s decision in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 7:00 am
(Harris v City of Santa Monica, February 7, 2013, 96 EPD ¶44749). [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:57 am
See Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am
United States, 17-6540, Orr v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:28 pm
It therefore declined to apply the direct evidence test under Price Waterhouse. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 8:43 am
§ 2000e-2(a)(1), meant “gender identity” and included “transgender status” when Congress enacted Title VII in 1964; and (2) whether Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 7:04 am
§ 2000e-2(a)(1), meant “gender identity” and included “transgender status” when Congress enacted Title VII in 1964; and (2) whether Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 3:51 pm
Supreme Court’s ruling in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:10 am
For instance, in United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 4:12 pm
He represented plaintiffs in important lawsuits involving claims of racial or gender bias by employers, including Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
” Some of the first dress and grooming code cases preceded the Supreme Court’s 1989 decision in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 11:22 am
“This is certainly the trend seen in a lot of Title VII cases as courts seem more receptive to the argument that discrimination due to sex stereotyping is prohibited by Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
