Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 221 - 240
of 336
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2013, 9:08 pm
And there's a jury (we don't learn who they are). [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 8:21 am
Personal grievances don't count. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 12:35 pm
For the exact same reasons we do so on the civil side. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 2:29 pm
Ones favorable to the defense don't come around all that often. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 12:39 pm
Judges can "assess" court fees without a written bill of costs, but counties can't collect the money. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 10:40 am
Since finding the identity of an infringer generally requires a lawsuit and lawsuits, as we mentioned above, are expensive, these companies often attempt to reduce the amount they spend by rolling up hundreds or even thousands of defendants into one lawsuit. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 6:37 am
We still don't know what the level for renewal fees will be -- and that will be influential in determining whether to opt for the old system or the new. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 5:30 am
"I'm sure that if we really knew that number, we would all be shocked." [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 12:31 pm
One bad thing about being in academia is that you don't have a keen sense of when (or if) "regular" people work over the holidays. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 9:28 pm
"To put it differently," we continued, "a case announces a new rule if the result was not dictated by precedent existing at the time the defendant's conviction became final." [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 6:32 am
The specific facts are still murky - did a sentry chide a child who reported an overdue bill; did a victim of the events provoke the violence; did Preston say "fire" or "don't fire"? [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 2:23 pm
We are a nation of laws. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 5:11 am
This would require a jury trial at which the parties would present and defend their positions on the appropriate royalty rates. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 6:13 pm
We don't know what happened next (although we can speculate -- especially since the company was defending other "hijab accommodation" lawsuits. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 1:35 pm
It's foolish to keep carping that we don't have it, except that he keeps getting a forum to do so. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 7:54 pm
If, for whatever reason, the company were sued for bad faith, don’t you think the judge and jury would be impressed at your zeal to help the insured get coverage? [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 2:06 am
But one employee of the "Haunted Empire" is apparently all it takes to be haunted by a lawsuit.Fortunately, we have a "loser pays" rule here. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 8:18 am
So we may never find out who wins the case. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 8:35 pm
We call that kind of person a Loser, with a capital “L. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 10:44 am
Towns Don't Need Tanks. [read post]
