Search for: "Weinstein v Weinstein"
Results 221 - 240
of 856
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2019, 6:03 am
Colosimo, Steven Epstein, Matthew V. [read post]
2 Nov 2019, 6:05 am
Colosimo, Steven Epstein, Matthew V. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 7:49 am
Kurtz v. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 8:00 am
Without the Zeran v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:25 am
Gore to Harvey Weinstein. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 2:25 pm
Weinstein et al. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 11:39 am
Salmon (duty of loyalty) Smith v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 9:05 am
Salmon (duty of loyalty) Smith v. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 2:37 pm
In City of Duluth v. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 6:33 am
Norwitz and Sabastian V. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 6:16 am
Lucas, Matthew V. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
City of Boca Ratonand Burlington Industries v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 6:17 am
., on Friday, July 5, 2019 Tags: Boards of Directors, Controlling shareholders, Dual-class stock, ESG, Institutional Investors, Lyft, Shareholder voting, Uber Director Independence and Oversight Obligation in Marchand v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 6:08 am
In Marchand v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:20 am
Nor is summary judgment precluded by defendant’s legal malpractice counterclaim, since the record shows that plaintiff performed a great deal of work that was unrelated to the isolated malpractice claim found viable by the court (see Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady, LLP v Rose, 111 AD3d 453 [2013], lv denied 23 NY3d 904 [2014]; Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein v Ackerman, 280 AD2d 355, 356 [2001]). [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:20 am
Nor is summary judgment precluded by defendant’s legal malpractice counterclaim, since the record shows that plaintiff performed a great deal of work that was unrelated to the isolated malpractice claim found viable by the court (see Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady, LLP v Rose, 111 AD3d 453 [2013], lv denied 23 NY3d 904 [2014]; Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein v Ackerman, 280 AD2d 355, 356 [2001]). [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 6:57 am
See Spire Securities, LLC v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 1:20 pm
Thus, from the tellingly named Sealed Plaintiff v. [read post]
1 Jun 2019, 6:24 pm
See Christian v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am
The cause of action “exists where a party to a contract receives bills or invoices and does not protest within a reasonable time” (Russo v Heller, 80 AD3d 531, 532 (1st Dept 2011] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]), or where partial payment has been made (see Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein, LLP v Waters, 13 AD3d 51, 52 [1st Dept 2004]). [read post]
