Search for: "Wells et al v. First Acceptance Services Inc et al" Results 221 - 240 of 260
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP ThinkTank),Michael Geist: presentation on open access, focusing on why adopting open access models can help counter restrictive contractual terms and copyright laws: (Michael Geist),Audacity – Sometimes sheer audacity can overcome superior forces, or a well-entrenched position: (IP ThinkTank),Presentation on IPR and professional opportunities for advocates and chartered accountants: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP),Grand (IP)… [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:51 am by Karina Lytvynska
Now, one can get stunning portraits of all these and many more at the low cost of $10 and likely a few morals here and there — if one is willing to ignore some major ethical red flags (as tempting as that may be…) as well as concerning legal and privacy issues. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:22 am by Steve Bainbridge
Default rules in this sense provide cost savings comparable to those provided by standard form contracts, because both can be accepted without the need for costly negotiation. [read post]
30 May 2022, 9:00 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Troy Kessler
Under Title VII, protected religious beliefs are not dependent on whether they are “acceptable, logical, consistent, or comprehensible to others,” Thomas v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 7:26 am by stevemehta
STEVEN WYNER et al., Defendants and Respondents. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm by opseo
Well under Texas law, solely managed community property (including wages) of the non-debtor spouse is not property of bankruptcy estate. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
Since 1663, the Royal Society has sported the motto:  “Nullius in verba,” on no one’s authority. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  The most striking example of apparently mistaken incontestability comes from B&B v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 9:22 am by David Kopel
Baby Girl, 570 U.S. 637, 658-65 (2013); and in his dissent from denial of certiorari in Upstate Citizens for Equality, Inc v. [read post]