Search for: "Wells v. Supervisors"
Results 221 - 240
of 3,108
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2020, 6:15 am
Today's episode features Smith v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 7:27 am
Defendants say that plaintiff's employment contract was not extended because of low student evaluations as well as student complaints about his classroom performance. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Termination of employment recommended by the Administrative Law Judge after finding the employee guilty of insubordination and incompetenceDep't of City Planning v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Termination of employment recommended by the Administrative Law Judge after finding the employee guilty of insubordination and incompetenceDep't of City Planning v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 1:24 pm
The case, Wright v. [read post]
13 May 2018, 8:08 am
Food Supervisor Carlock, 2018 U.S. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 9:58 am
Soto, et al v. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 9:42 am
Recently, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, in Minarsky v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 4:26 am
In Rivera v. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 7:49 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 12:55 am
In Ogugua v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 6:38 am
Wells Fargo Bank, March 14, 2017, Haikala, M.). [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 8:32 am
In Crawford v Metro. [read post]
5 May 2014, 6:36 am
She contended that during this conversation, her supervisor complained that this prevented the supervisor from taking her vacation, which was scheduled for the first two weeks of August. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 6:39 am
” In this case, the supervisor was well aware of the activities about which the employee complained. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 8:50 pm
Yesterday, in Gowski v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 7:11 am
And the evidence showing pretext with respect to the discrimination claim was also sufficient to raise genuine issues of fact on the retaliation claim as well. [read post]
14 May 2019, 3:30 am
However, the Supreme Court in Oncale v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 7:07 am
Citing evidence of racial animus on the part of the supervisor and coworker, as well as evidence they tampered with her work and that her supervisor refused to train or even speak with her after she complained about racism, the court revived both her cat’s paw discrimination and retaliation claims over the laboratory’s arguments that it was a “mathematical certainty” that sabotage alone could not have created such poor performance results (Miller… [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 1:52 pm
After they returned, their supervisor allegedly made additional derogatory comments, and they complained of a number of other incidents as well. [read post]
