Search for: "Williams v. Nixon"
Results 221 - 240
of 293
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2010, 12:06 pm
This principle goes back to the great William Blackstone, who said in his commentaries "Acts of Parliament derogatory from the power of subsequent parliaments be naught. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
That argument is based on a line of civil cases establishing that presidents can’t be held liable via monetary damages for their official actions—more specifically, as the Supreme Court held in 1981 in Nixon v. [read post]
25 May 2019, 7:19 am
Nixon. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 7:35 am
” More significant was his draft opinion in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:05 pm
” In September, the parties in United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 7:48 am
In Trump v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm
Former Chief Justice William Rehnquist wrote the majority opinion in the seminal case of Seminole Tribe of Florida v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
In 1972, the per se flood crested in U.S. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:00 pm
In 1970, (Republican) President Nixon signed Title X into law, which led to the creation of federally funded family-planning clinics across the country. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 7:30 am
Gayle (Montgomery Bus Boycott) and Williams v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
Justices Hugo Black and William O. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
Powell and Harry Blackmun (Nixon), David H. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
Powell and Harry Blackmun (Nixon), David H. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 1:53 pm
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins on the occasion of the publication of “Business and the Roberts Court” (Oxford University Press, 2016, pp. 342), edited by Jonathan H. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 8:51 pm
Ringgold v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 12:25 pm
Chief Justice William Rehnquist articulated this view in his concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
1 Aug 2024, 2:43 pm
Curiously, the statute says nothing at all about civil immunity under Nixon v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 6:35 am
Here’s the key, striking passage from page 7 of the government's petition in Trump v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 11:00 am
In the first part of this series, I concluded that the “president cannot obstruct justice when he exercises his lawful authority that is vested by Article II of the Constitution. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 3:54 pm
While immunity was extended during Watergate to two top Nixon officials, John W. [read post]
