Search for: "Williams v. Taylor"
Results 221 - 240
of 457
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2020, 7:05 pm
Williams, 362 N.C. 628 (2008). [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 11:53 am
Lack of assessment of features 'commonplace' in current papercut works DJ Clarke outlined the correct approach to be used in comparing artistic works, as that of Lord Hoffman in Designers Guild Ltd v Russell Williams (Textile) Ltd. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 7:45 am
A note before starting: One of the earliest contributions to this literature was my co-blogger David Bernstein's 2001 article in the William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm
The case I discuss below, Manuel v. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 7:01 am
William Freeman (1847), among many others. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 6:57 pm
One could argue that even the choice of twelve as the number of jurors might be sufficiently arbitrary and accidental that some variation would be permitted, see Williams v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 1:32 am
Judge William Alsup stated the United States Supreme Court 'has not yet made a clear ruling that admission of irrelevant or overtly prejudicial evidence constitutes a due process violation sufficient to warrant issuance of the writ.' Holley v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 9:38 am
The complaint lists Nixon partners Edward O’Callaghan, William Kelly, and Robert Bernius and associate Matthew Grazier as also playing roles in the NewPoint representation. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 5:46 am
I went back 99 years to Haas v. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 1:18 pm
(See Affidavit of Taylor Cratsley, dated November 21, 2016). [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 8:05 pm
Brandon Arnae Taylor, 2010 Cal. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 9:49 pm
Okla. 2006) William G. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 8:37 pm
Noncapital United States v Styles Taylor and Keon Thomas, 2011 U.S. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 3:51 pm
(William Hennessy) Kagan interpreted the HEROES Act very differently. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 7:52 pm
Taylor v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 6:46 pm
U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, October 13, 2008 Taylor v. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 5:54 am
In some instances a public employer has negotiated a "no outside employment" provision in the course of collective bargaining under the Taylor Law that provides that approval of outside employment is at the sole discretion of the appointing authority.However, other provisions of law may bar moonlighting involving certain employers.For example, an article in the August 25, 2010 issue of the Buffalo News reported: “Police officers cannot work in a licensed bar, restaurant or… [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 12:13 am
Taylor Western District of Michigan at Grand Rapids 08a0725n.06 USA v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 5:34 am
Taylor v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 5:58 am
Kansas v. [read post]
