Search for: "YORK v. PAGE"
Results 221 - 240
of 5,467
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2023, 10:25 am
But in the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:18 am
The 10-page brief cited more than half a dozen relevant court decisions such as Martinez v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 4:30 am
See Raines v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 12:17 pm
The case is called Greenberg v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 12:23 am
Douglas Strang, Scottish Legal News: Higgs v Farmor’s School and others. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 9:03 am
About the Author Kouros is a recent graduate from New York University’s College of Arts and Science with a BA in Art History and Political Science. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 2:49 pm
Virginia Museum of Fine ArtsLaw Library of Congress’ Actual Malice: Civil Rights and Freedom of the Press in New York Times v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
See Doe v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm
(Yesterday, Samantha Barbas present on her book, Actual Malice: Civil Rights and Freedom of the Press in New York Times v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
Further, said the court, "Judicial review of an administrative penalty is limited to whether the measure or mode of penalty or discipline imposed constitutes an abuse of discretion as a matter of law" and "An administrative penalty must be upheld unless it is so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness, thus constituting an abuse of discretion as a matter of law" (see Matter of Bolt v New York City Dept. of Educ., 30 NY3d… [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
Further, said the court, "Judicial review of an administrative penalty is limited to whether the measure or mode of penalty or discipline imposed constitutes an abuse of discretion as a matter of law" and "An administrative penalty must be upheld unless it is so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness, thus constituting an abuse of discretion as a matter of law" (see Matter of Bolt v New York City Dept. of Educ., 30 NY3d… [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
By Eric SegallI had an existential crisis in the Spring of 2012, just a few months before the hugely important Affordable Care Act case, NFIB v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 3:37 pm
From McCollum v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:13 pm
Smith v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 7:55 am
Which means Held v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 4:34 am
With that appetite in mind, I’m delighted to blog about a recent decision from New York County Commercial Division Justice Jennifer Schecter, Rosenthal v Erber, No. 650771/2021 (Sup Ct, NY County 2023). [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 4:00 pm
Visit the Legal Developments page to see the latest topics, which also include breaking legal news and related Practical Guidance content. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 2:01 pm
Specifically, in an apparent effort to get around the obviously binding force of the Electoral Count Act – as to which John Eastman infamously wrote Vice President Pence’s chief counsel to “implore” him to consider “one more relatively minor violation” of the ECA (para 122) – Chesebro completely misused part of the latest edition of my constitutional law treatise (he cites the pages referenced above). [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 5:04 am
The 92nd Street Y, New York City. [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
His public comment to The History of Public Adjusting—Samuel Milch v. [read post]
