Search for: "Young v. Department Of Corrections" Results 221 - 240 of 467
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm by Giles Peaker
Barking had assessed her date of birth to be 4 June 1993 and that assessment was taken as correct in this case, though MK claimed to be two years younger.She had been living with her aunt, Ms A, and her aunt’s two young children. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm by Giles Peaker
Barking had assessed her date of birth to be 4 June 1993 and that assessment was taken as correct in this case, though MK claimed to be two years younger.She had been living with her aunt, Ms A, and her aunt’s two young children. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 11:07 am
It is about a young federal public defender handling a case, United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 12:10 pm
Sabatino, is describing the effect of Crawford v. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
Decision of the Complaints Committee – 00797-21 Sloane v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach – sanction: publication of correction. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 7:55 pm by Jamie Markham
§ 921.1402(d)(3) (Department of Corrections must give 18-month notice to juvenile offenders entitled to judicial review of sentence). [read post]
A special duty rule applies to protect children who are too young to understand certain risks. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
By Wolfmann [CC BY-SA 4.0 ], from Wikimedia Commons Minarsky v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
By Wolfmann [CC BY-SA 4.0 ], from Wikimedia Commons Minarsky v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 2:26 pm by Terry Lenamon
  In spite of the recommendations of the Florida Department of Corrections and the arguments of the defense counsel, Graham was sentenced to life imprisonment. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 6:34 am by MBettman
” Justice DeWine, to Cleveland’s Law Department Chief Counsel On March 6, 2019, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in City of Cleveland v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 5:40 pm
Florida, being argued at 10, and Sullivan v. [read post]