Search for: "Austin v. State"
Results 2381 - 2400
of 2,729
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2012, 11:34 am
• The 25th Anniversary of McCleskey v. [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 11:21 am
" Additionally, Healy v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 5:40 am
http://bit.ly/Q3mYPY (Dennis Kiker) States Enacting Rules on Use of Electronic Data in Medical Liability Cases – http://bit.ly/NztMYc (IHealthBeat) Technology Review: A FrameWork for Managing People, Technology and Processes - http://bit.ly/NrQlhv (Lynn Frances) Tips for Identifying and Preserving ESI – http://bit.ly/OXF9Xj (James Bernard, Michael Quartararo, Jason Vinokur) Twitter Contempt Sanctions Increase Need for Social Media Governance Plan… [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
In Capital v. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm
This paper presents a survey of federal and state court decisions on these two questions, hoping to offer some guidance to practitioners. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:57 pm
Texas’s state legislature in Austin this year drew new election maps for both state legislative chambers, and for the 36 House seats. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:33 pm
” In 2013, Kennedy would provide the key vote and write for the court in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 12:48 pm
University of Texas at Austin.) [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 11:50 am
” The law was set to go into effect on December 2, but on November 29, a federal district court in Austin heard oral arguments on its (un)constitutionality. [read post]
16 Feb 2008, 2:34 am
See Anderson v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 8:23 am
Lamb, Jr. and Austin L. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 3:55 am
Fortunately, the Chief Justice is well known for guiding the Court in a manner that respects the function of an Article III court, evidenced by the decision in the Michigan v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:04 am
More on Atkins v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:45 pm
State v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
(United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 4:04 am
The Courtmodified this rule five years later in Tison v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under a different name,… [read post]
22 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
Brian v. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 8:00 am
Cimino v. [read post]
25 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
The topic of malapportionment is well-trodden ground, with established measures borne both of legal necessity following Baker v. [read post]
