Search for: "Caming v. United States"
Results 2381 - 2400
of 9,167
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2019, 1:01 am
Neither the United States nor any other country currently has the means to send a manned mission to the moon, said Michael J. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 4:09 pm
The three Republican judges on the emoluments panel decision were: Paul V. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 10:18 am
Take, for example, Justice Stevens’ solo dissent in United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 8:52 am
Facts: This case (Carrozza v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 11:40 am
He came to the United States as a lawful permanent resident in 1962 . . . . [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:32 am
Department of Justice (where she received the Attorney General’s Award for Exceptional Service – the department’s highest award for employee performance – as part of the team responsible for implementing the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
In Rucho v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 5:28 pm
Instead, the Administration is simply making it more difficult for students to remain in the United States by instituting new requirements for off-site training programs, making it more likely that foreign students will fall out of status and become subject to bars to admission to the United States. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 1:59 pm
(citing Maddalone v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 1:58 pm
During college, Stevens trained in cryptology and served as a codebreaker in the United States Navy from 1942 to 1945 during World War II. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 4:36 am
Over the weekend, President Trump tweeted out that several prominent “‘Progressive’ Democrat Congresswomen” (who, it shouldn’t have to be said but does, are all American citizens, most of whom were born in the United States) should “go back and help fix the totally broken and crime infested places from which they came. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:54 am
Importantly, Chapter V of the GDPR authorizes only three methods for legal data transfers from the EEA to a third country, such as the United States: adequacy decisions, appropriate safeguards or limited enumerated exceptions (“derogations”). [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 1:05 pm
Circuit’s decision in Armstrong v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 9:23 am
State v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 9:23 am
State v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
Gennady V. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 9:10 am
When it came to the specific meta-analysis at issue, the court did not discuss or analyze a single pertinent detail of the Report. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 8:22 pm
Then, quoting Standard Oil v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 2:29 pm
United States that the defendant must be aware of the threatening nature of the communication, but that element seems easily satisfied in this case. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
Responding to the Supreme Court’s 5-4 ruling last week in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
