Search for: "Cross v. Cross" Results 2381 - 2400 of 21,844
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2016, 3:48 pm
 So the trial court booted the defendant, then let the trial go on with no one there for him -- including the direct examination of the victim -- and then let him back in only to cross-examine the main witness . . . having never heard her testimony on direct?! [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 1:35 am by Dr. Stuart Baran
  In Human Genome Sciences Inc v Eli Lilly and Company [2010] EWCA Civ 33, all of these questions had to be considered before evaluating the validity of a patent owned by Human Genome Sciences (“HGS”). [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 9:41 am by Florian Mueller
For now I just wanted to share the scheduling information with you immediately.Oracle's opening brief:Oracle's appeal brief likens Google to fictitious Harry Potter knockoff author 'Ann Droid'Google's answering brief to Oracle's opening brief (and opening brief for its own cross-appeal):Google says Java APIs lost copyrightability like Aspirin lost trademark protection over timeOracle's reply brief in support of its appeal (and answer to Google's cross-appeal):Oracle to appeals… [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 6:50 am
The court adds that he can cross-examine her at trial, but that would not permit suppression, would it?) [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 3:47 pm by Injury at Sea
Thursday, unable to cross the Yaquina Bay bar as 20-foot seas continue to thrash the Oregon coast. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 6:10 pm by Dwight Sullivan
As Bob McCarty reports here,  ACCA today rejected the appeal and petition for new trial in United States v. [read post]
22 May 2010, 5:38 am by Deborah Pearlstein
Circuit crossed that threshhold here. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 9:23 pm
The court mentioned that no fences had to be crossed to get to the back door. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 3:30 am by Eboni Nelson
Duncan Kennedy, The Bitter Ironies of Williams v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 4:50 am by David Oxenford
In a decision just published, Prometheus Radio Project v FCC, the Court reviewed the FCC's 2007 actions relaxing the newspaper-broadcast cross-ownership rules and adopting policies to increase diversity in broadcast ownership. [read post]